Community development - one illustration
Yes, you thought correctly, this post is a reaction to niasilin notes :)
Communities are what web 2.0 gave us (let's argue? :) ). I would apply a certain project-based approach to the review of the life cycle of a community, which will be discussed.
This community you know well. I'm talking about Habr.
')
When he first appeared (I was here almost from the very beginning) - everything was small, and it was not entirely clear what the fathers / founders wanted. But there was little content, it was quite interesting, as a result, it was all possible to digest.
But the amount of time is gradually turning into quality: the project is getting bigger, but it is still not entirely clear - what do fathers want?
Is it the media? Is it social media? Is this a classic community with co-generated content? Uh ... I'm confused ...
Of course, I'm not trying to get into my own business. But "notes" is, IMHO, a bell. It is necessary to determine the concept, and specialize on the sly :)
Communities are what web 2.0 gave us (let's argue? :) ). I would apply a certain project-based approach to the review of the life cycle of a community, which will be discussed.
This community you know well. I'm talking about Habr.
')
When he first appeared (I was here almost from the very beginning) - everything was small, and it was not entirely clear what the fathers / founders wanted. But there was little content, it was quite interesting, as a result, it was all possible to digest.
But the amount of time is gradually turning into quality: the project is getting bigger, but it is still not entirely clear - what do fathers want?
Is it the media? Is it social media? Is this a classic community with co-generated content? Uh ... I'm confused ...
Of course, I'm not trying to get into my own business. But "notes" is, IMHO, a bell. It is necessary to determine the concept, and specialize on the sly :)
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/2716/
All Articles