📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Flour choice or "Big Three" vs Supermicro

Hi, Habr! Judging by our past articles, the question of choosing a server in the context of economic stagnation is clearly not the least important in IT circles and in any other field. Today we will touch on the burning topic. We often encounter disputes between adherents of the troika and Supermicro — which is better. Also, we often hear the question - why buy servers of expensive vendors, if there is a budget Supermicro. Facing this controversy often, we have prepared a small comparison about the features of the products of the Big Three vendors and the proven Supermicro, and offer to understand the pros and cons of both sides.



Three whales - why we love them




What we dislike the "Big Three"



SuperMicro - 3 reasons to fall in love



')

Objective Cons Supermicro


All the disadvantages of these servers are direct consequences of their merits. And the most important of them is often lower reliability than the products of the Big Three. Although this question remains controversial, since the products SuperMicro is quite a good workhorse and the opinion of reliability is purely individual.
But with another drawback of this brand can not argue. And this is a low quality service.
The fact is that SuperMicro does not have a representative office in Russia. So, all warranty obligations and server maintenance issues are covered by the distributor. Do I have to say which delay in the end often results in this?

What is the result?


And in the end it turns out, an ambiguous situation. On the one hand, there are reliable servers of the big three, to which, perhaps, there are no questions on quality, but with a high price. On the other hand, quite good-quality SuperMicro servers, however, without a glorious history behind, but with a very affordable price and a lot of options for performance and content. Agree, the choice is not easy.
But, often, SuperMicro is used for solving non-critical tasks as backup machines, although on the other hand, many companies have all IT infrastructure at this manufacturer. But the servers of the big three work where compromise is unacceptable.

How things are changing in the market of recovered servers


Of course, you already know that we specialize in server recovery . So let me add to this review our “5 kopecks”.
We are engaged in the restoration of the Big Three servers - HP, IBM, Dell. Our refurbished servers are distinguished by:
- The price is 20-70% lower than that of new solutions
- 3-5 years warranty
- Service and repair in the territory of the client.
- Reliability
- The maximum age of our restored servers is 4 years, the average is 2 years.
What does it mean? At a minimum, what we offer to the client is recovered HP, Dell, IBM servers with impeccable reliability and high level of support at a favorable price. If the question is: why buy HP, Dell, IBM, if there is SuperMicro, then we will put it differently. Why buy SuperMicro, if you have a restored HP, Dell and IBM at the same price.

Where is the restored SuperMicro?


Not with us. We do not deal with these machines. Why? The main reason for this is the manufacturer’s lack of standardized iron. This does not allow us to give a full-fledged guarantee for such servers and carry out their repair on the client’s territory.

Which servers do you prefer and why? We are interested to learn about the experience of using this or that vendor, so share your opinion in the comments!

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/266475/


All Articles