One of the reasons why “wrong” programs are more popular than “right” programs.

I have a couple of familiar geeks who don’t recognize the mouse, and the console has the cutest interface. Type more effective. Of course, type a quick command and press enter much faster. And their niksa, probably, correct, unlike wrong Windows.

That's just such a thing ... training most users to work with "correct" and "effective" software is too time consuming, money and effort. And the result is not guaranteed, but we must work now. And then, you trained the employee, and then he took and went to another company.

That is why the massive introduction of "correct" and "effective" software is wrong and ineffective.
')
You can curse Bill Gates, Microsoft and a buggy Windows as much as you like, extol Linux-Unix-Firefox as much as you like (and what else is usually praised during holy wars), but you can’t argue against nature.

The nature is such that people do not want to waste their time, energy, nerves on learning the “right” programs. They do not cause delight console. They are not interested in mounting disks, compiling kernels and understanding the differences between Linux distributions.

Lamers? Lemmings? Blondes? It’s easier to call them that than come to terms with a simple thought: they have enough intelligence to make money. And for some reason they spend this money on Microsoft products. It is easier to think that the reason is their stupidity and laziness than the lack of friendliness of the “right” software, its complexity and (very often) an unattractive interface.

Now you can start here holy wars.