Tired of number 2 (with evidence)

I came to work today, opened an rss reader and what I see ...
First, the Gmail post in a new way , where the author claims that he figured it out himself, without going to the Internet nirazu Although here , quite by accident (and not the first time) such an article.
Then it's even cooler - Generating text for a “fish” in Microsoft Word is an article from the same site, with a completely different source, which in turn does not refer to the original, although screenshots from this site
Therefore, I join the unjustly minted, gimlis with my boredom and blia with a failed attempt to announce the blog of the barnes created by the extractor