I can do without Git, yeah

Of course ... If you can program , why do you need Git?
You are quite able to manage your code with the help of the archiver, and you perfectly understand what archive name corresponds to the state of your project.

You are quite able to unarchive exactly the archive that contains the state of the project to which you need to roll back, and then create a new archive, slightly different from the archive version 2.0, and call it in 2.1.1 + feature1_and_2_iz in1.arch

Then, oh Happiness, in your project appeared succumbed or even a partner.
Of course, you can explain to him that the name of the archive should be read like this:
The first characters are the current version number, and some subtleties can be described in the remaining characters of the archive name, or in the archive comments.
')
It's just that all this has been accomplished by Linux developers, for many, many years (since 1991, consider it yourself).
And in order not to invent all these rules, Linux developers decided to do a thing that would be understandable to anyone who wants to understand, and even give this thing to anyone who wants to (even if you are not a Linux developer, but, for example, 1C, or Postgress, or your personal New Google's).

And yes, if you are a developer and are looking for work, you are unlikely to find a normal job in an office that does not use Git.
Worse is another ... If you find an office that does not use Git, you are in the wrong office.

And if this article was for you, just read this
git-scm.com/book/ru/v1
(I read it 3 times before)

UPD: guys, then the comments were in the form
> Writing style and attitudes towards users of other VCS
This post is not about other WOS , this is a post about the fact that novice programmers do not use any WOS. ;)
And if the office is using GWS not Git - aha, that’s the same
Chmaki everyone in this chat