Stream: Is PR done well?
Noisy yes. Well done. I will not say anything about the quality - PR was heard (heard) right away. For this comment I was minus one. Those who sow PR? - It does not matter and does not matter.
Closer to the topic.
Come here . This is sorting the query "call to the support of the stream" by date.
What is interesting here you can see.
1. The time of the first three records posted 17.23. The very first and most popular, which is the original, is laid out on May 22. The remaining two at the same time 23 numbers. Coincidence?
')
2. Detailed tagging to the maximum of the very first audio clip and two videojabs. Everywhere there is a tag support. The bulk of other tags are not particularly adequate, but they are equally numerous.
3. And ... The first video toad was published after 7 hours, at night (the audio recording was published on May 22 at 17.23, the video toad was posted on May 23 at 1.41). Those. It should be removed before 20.00 approximately - before dark. And there we see the daytime shooting. In 3-4 hours you can theoretically invent a plot, shoot it and mix it with sound for the rest of the time. But hardly found such nimble and initiative. Therefore, with this unambiguous fawn :)
If all the talk about the fact that Stream prepared for this crop thoroughly for several months is true, then it seems to me strange that they did not think about what to sow, when and how. IMHO, definitely it was necessary to wait to roll out their videojab.
Closer to the topic.
Come here . This is sorting the query "call to the support of the stream" by date.
What is interesting here you can see.
1. The time of the first three records posted 17.23. The very first and most popular, which is the original, is laid out on May 22. The remaining two at the same time 23 numbers. Coincidence?
')
2. Detailed tagging to the maximum of the very first audio clip and two videojabs. Everywhere there is a tag support. The bulk of other tags are not particularly adequate, but they are equally numerous.
3. And ... The first video toad was published after 7 hours, at night (the audio recording was published on May 22 at 17.23, the video toad was posted on May 23 at 1.41). Those. It should be removed before 20.00 approximately - before dark. And there we see the daytime shooting. In 3-4 hours you can theoretically invent a plot, shoot it and mix it with sound for the rest of the time. But hardly found such nimble and initiative. Therefore, with this unambiguous fawn :)
If all the talk about the fact that Stream prepared for this crop thoroughly for several months is true, then it seems to me strange that they did not think about what to sow, when and how. IMHO, definitely it was necessary to wait to roll out their videojab.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/26120/
All Articles