Insanity is getting stronger?

Good afternoon, dear readers.
My morning began with a letter of such content.

— , . 31.07.2014 № 758.
, .

Here are excerpts from the ruling
')
1. , 21 2005 N 241 " " ( , 2005, N 17, .1572; 2007, N 49, .6174), :

) 3_1 :"3_1. . , , ( ) , , .";

) 9 :"9. (, , ( ), , ), , 6 .".

Well here it is clear, give the passport in the cafe with wi-fi and use it, although no one guarantees how your data will be stored in the cafe, who will work with them?

2. , 23 2006 N 32 " " ( , 2006, N 5, .553; 2008, N 8, .749), :

) 24_1 :"24_1. . , , ( ) , , . .";

) 26_1 :"26_1. - , , 26 , , () , , , , , () (, , ( ), , , ), .".

Now, the list of persons is also not issued upon request, but the organization itself must submit everything, and also monitor the equipment ((

3. , 10 2007 N 575 " " ( , 2007, N 38, .4552; 2008, N 8, .749), :

) 17_1 :"17_1. . , , ( ) , , . .";

) 22_1 :"22_1. - , , 22 , , () , , , , , () (, , ( ), , , ), .".

Now even if your organization has nothing to do with the distribution of free wi-fi, but there are just users who go to the Internet, still provide information!

Personally, my opinion is that this is too much.
And by the way added work for the system administrator.