Summarizing
If you go to the questions section, you can only see the vote. It would be better if the person (who raises the topic) had a habit of summing up, to draw a conclusion in such posts: why such results, what other options or thoughts appeared, what topic is this question about (Often there is a certain post in blogs, and then in voting question on the same topic). In some cases, the closing of the discussion (after all, there are topics when the following words do not make sense), but with the ability to write something extra, or something like linbi, discarding the discussion of the topic from offtopic and repeating the same questions (after all, the same comments in different places of discussion - also cluttering the page). Otherwise, it turns out that every discussion is eternal, and it has no end.
You also need an explanation for the questions, otherwise it is just written in a comment, there you can also write a conclusion. For example, in a question about a programming language, indicate that it is related to the already remote question about the most promising language for the Web. By the way, in no small part the option for viewing results (“UFO”) becomes selected, although it is clear that it should be separated with a different color. Thus, a slight refinement from the server side is required - to add a separate answer to the question-writing form with the default text “I want only to see the answers” ​​or the like. Otherwise, just forget)
So, it turns out that that part of Habratopic, which are not a full-fledged article on a specific topic (which the author complements only if there are mistakes or inaccuracies in it), but are “conversational” (which do not make sense without condemnation), remain unfinished, in which everyone will say his opinion, he may find out something, but this discussion will not come to anything. (The same minus in the traditional linear Internet forums, but the topic is not about them)
It is also rare to see links to topics that precede the topic, or continue, although there is a whole mechanism for Trackback .
')
And also the closing tag / habracut is not enough, and in the preview of the post in a cropped form, to see how much under the cut is removed.
The first public post, so if it turns out to be meaningless - I will delete so as not to disgrace) Need to transfer to the Ideas for the site ?
You also need an explanation for the questions, otherwise it is just written in a comment, there you can also write a conclusion. For example, in a question about a programming language, indicate that it is related to the already remote question about the most promising language for the Web. By the way, in no small part the option for viewing results (“UFO”) becomes selected, although it is clear that it should be separated with a different color. Thus, a slight refinement from the server side is required - to add a separate answer to the question-writing form with the default text “I want only to see the answers” ​​or the like. Otherwise, just forget)
So, it turns out that that part of Habratopic, which are not a full-fledged article on a specific topic (which the author complements only if there are mistakes or inaccuracies in it), but are “conversational” (which do not make sense without condemnation), remain unfinished, in which everyone will say his opinion, he may find out something, but this discussion will not come to anything. (The same minus in the traditional linear Internet forums, but the topic is not about them)
It is also rare to see links to topics that precede the topic, or continue, although there is a whole mechanism for Trackback .
')
And also the closing tag / habracut is not enough, and in the preview of the post in a cropped form, to see how much under the cut is removed.
The first public post, so if it turns out to be meaningless - I will delete so as not to disgrace) Need to transfer to the Ideas for the site ?
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/23038/
All Articles