 As we see, on the left we have “Inbox”, where all the tasks that you don’t know how to proceed are added. If you decide that the task needs to be solved exactly today, then it is sent to the “Today” section. If the task is not so urgent, then place it in the “Next” section. There are two more sections left: “Someday” (“Someday”) and “Scheduled” (“Scheduled”). I especially like the “Someday” section, where I bring in something that is not very important in the near future, but I would still like to do it. For example, there you can bring "Learn Spanish" or "Buy a shirt", you know what I mean. In “Scheduled”, the cases that need to be completed up to a certain time are entered. In addition to the four sections listed, your cases and tasks can be defined in “Projects” (“Projects”) or “Areas” (“Areas”). The screenshot shows that I have “Haywired” in “Projects”, where all the tasks related to the blog fall into, and in “Areas” I have “Design / Illustration” and “Freelance”, where I bring all the cases related to to this area of ​​my work. In Things, you do not need to enter any metadata imposed on you, such as “Efforts”, “Priority” and others, as is customary in many GTD systems. Instead, Things has an advanced tree tag system. Use as much meta data as you need, or don't use it at all. All used tags are displayed on top. If you select one or more tags, your affairs will be instantly filtered by the selected tags. Personally, I use temporary contexts (“5 min”, “15 min”, ...), importance (“low”, “medium”, “high”) and some others.
 As we see, on the left we have “Inbox”, where all the tasks that you don’t know how to proceed are added. If you decide that the task needs to be solved exactly today, then it is sent to the “Today” section. If the task is not so urgent, then place it in the “Next” section. There are two more sections left: “Someday” (“Someday”) and “Scheduled” (“Scheduled”). I especially like the “Someday” section, where I bring in something that is not very important in the near future, but I would still like to do it. For example, there you can bring "Learn Spanish" or "Buy a shirt", you know what I mean. In “Scheduled”, the cases that need to be completed up to a certain time are entered. In addition to the four sections listed, your cases and tasks can be defined in “Projects” (“Projects”) or “Areas” (“Areas”). The screenshot shows that I have “Haywired” in “Projects”, where all the tasks related to the blog fall into, and in “Areas” I have “Design / Illustration” and “Freelance”, where I bring all the cases related to to this area of ​​my work. In Things, you do not need to enter any metadata imposed on you, such as “Efforts”, “Priority” and others, as is customary in many GTD systems. Instead, Things has an advanced tree tag system. Use as much meta data as you need, or don't use it at all. All used tags are displayed on top. If you select one or more tags, your affairs will be instantly filtered by the selected tags. Personally, I use temporary contexts (“5 min”, “15 min”, ...), importance (“low”, “medium”, “high”) and some others.  Another nice addition is the input window, called by the global hot key, by pressing which you can quickly enter a new task. In the window you can also drag a link or text from Safari, or correspondence from Adium and Mail.
 Another nice addition is the input window, called by the global hot key, by pressing which you can quickly enter a new task. In the window you can also drag a link or text from Safari, or correspondence from Adium and Mail.  In order to work more productively, I do not want to play according to rigidly established rules and master complex programs. I don't want to mess with filters. I don’t want to endlessly sort the columns “Location”, “Time” and so on, as the OmniFocus developers conceived. In Things, tasks look like a simple string with a title and a check box. Everything else is secondary: if you do not enter tags, a description or a date, then you will not see them. In OmniFocus, empty columns only introduce confusion and confusion. The task manager should dissolve in the background and not impersonate. Things does this perfectly well. Point.
 In order to work more productively, I do not want to play according to rigidly established rules and master complex programs. I don't want to mess with filters. I don’t want to endlessly sort the columns “Location”, “Time” and so on, as the OmniFocus developers conceived. In Things, tasks look like a simple string with a title and a check box. Everything else is secondary: if you do not enter tags, a description or a date, then you will not see them. In OmniFocus, empty columns only introduce confusion and confusion. The task manager should dissolve in the background and not impersonate. Things does this perfectly well. Point.Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/22981/
All Articles