For some time now at work, I have been trying to fight the following practice:
- The analyst sends a draft version of the functional specification in a Word document via E-mail to programmers, testers, and maintainers.
- each makes its own changes and sends them back.
- The analyst brings together what he considers necessary and the process is repeated until the document is approved.
As an alternative, I offered to work with the wiki.
So far all my attempts came across the following arguments:
- we are so used;
- inconvenient to work with the wiki;
- well, some technical types of notifications, etc. (which are basically solvable and are called more for excuses).
And now I came across an interesting illustration of the interaction on the net.
')
www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/03/26/wiki-collaboration-leads-to-happinessNow I will try to more clearly formulate the pros and cons, starting from this scheme.
What do you think about this?