⬆️ ⬇️

First impressions of Habré: karma.

I started to sit on Habrahabr quite recently. I really liked the site, the notes and comments in it are interesting, the communication is lively, and there are many other advantages to the rest of social services. by networks.

I will not continue to sing the praises of Habré, better tell about the "sick". That is about karma.



From the very first minutes, after registering at Habré, I began my active work: I began to participate in discussions. When given one vote to karma, wrote a blog entry. And he began to analyze further events. First, my karma began to change in a big way. However, it was obvious that someone minus it. Happy karma was under 2.0, and I left for a long time.



Returning in the evening, I found that the level of karma had dropped to 0.7. Of course, the first question I had was: “Why? For what???". And emotions at that moment can be described as: O_O.

')

And you know that this is the most offensive? And the fact that the answer to this question I have not received.



Today my karma is already more than 2. This is despite the fact that after yesterday’s fall I didn’t write anything. And this phenomenon of the jump of karma remained a mystery to me and, apart from a feeling of offense, left nothing.



Why am I all this? But to the fact that there is not enough reason for assessment on Habré. Yes, my opinion is subjective, maybe I still don’t understand something, because I haven’t spent much time here. Nevertheless, I decided to voice it.



If, when lowering / raising karma, voting for a comment, for a topic, users would have to enter the reason for their action, this would give:



1) the user would once again wonder whether he is right in giving such an assessment;

2) users would not make assessments only out of disagreement with the opinion of the author, no matter how well he described his thought and led the arguments;

3) there would be no assessments for the reason “you are an asshole” and the like expression of a subjective attitude towards the author without any grounds.




But the most important thing is that a valued person would see why there is such a reaction to him and what he needs to change! It is important.



At the same time, it is not at all necessary to show who gave a mark in order to avoid blood wars. Enough reasons.



Since I can not answer in the comments

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/22559/



All Articles