And not only actions.
It seemed to me important that the following information, which was in my hands, came into the view of the Habr community.
Namely, draft bylaws to the odious law on bloggers that come into force, which are now being prepared and are undergoing the final stages of coordination in a narrow circle behind closed doors. At the same time, at least a number of media outlets have unsubscribed about this today, but none of them posted directly the documents themselves or the links to them. What I correct.
In fact, the law “on bloggers” is far from being only about bloggers, it is just that it has become more widely known by the corresponding amendment, which has become regulated, including livelihoods and this category of network citizens. In my opinion, the most odious paragraphs of the
97-FZ , which will come into force on August 1, is a description of the responsibilities of information dissemination organizers (and the wording of the law includes owners of almost all types of Internet resources and even not only them, but the organizer of the Skype conference, etc., as the fantasy unfolds) to store and provide information to the authorized state agencies on the actions of users.
')
Bodies according to the following published rules want to know everything about everyone who visited this or that Internet resource: about the user ID, the entire contact list of his address book and e-mail, the number and volume of messages, all authorizations through third-party services, personal correspondence within the Internet resource, exact time of visits, list of DNS servers used by the user, and correspondence with hosting providers and domain name registrars, all information entered during the user’s registration on the Internet resource, information about the equipment and software used by the user, all facts of authorization with exact In other words, all the facts that the user has changed his data, facts about the termination of the use of the Internet resource by the user, facts about the money transactions made by the user, indicating information about the correspondent - the payment system identifier, currency and amount of transactions (indicating the payment system identifier ("e-wallet" ), the amounts of income or expenditure and a number of other no less seemingly confidential data, which only the initiator and the recipient should know about.
Such information should be kept by the dissemination organizer in Russian and English (and under the new law - six months).Another point of the relevant bylaw is also interesting: the
organizer (owner of the site), by agreement with the authorized state bodies, can provide access to such information about users in full on an ongoing basis and without any requests, then he is released from the obligation to store such information .I think later many owners of Internet resources will take advantage of this opportunity to not bother with data storage and regular reporting to the security services.
List of attached draft documents:1. Regulations for storing information and the procedure for its submission to authorized state bodies.
2. The procedure for notifying the RKN of the commencement of activities and the Procedure for maintaining the Register (draft Government Decree).
3. The procedure for interaction between Roskomnadzor and the organizer of information dissemination.
4. The list of personal, family and household needs in the implementation of activities on the functioning of IP and software for computers (draft Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation).
direct linkdirect linkdirect linkdirect link"B":
Yesterday a number of regulations were published on the Roskomsvoboda website that specify the execution of the so-called law on bloggers. The official representative of Roskomnadzor, Vadim Ampelonsky, confirmed to “Kommersant” the authenticity of the documents, stressing that these were their working versions. Another regulation that most interested the Internet industry has been developed by the FSB, it describes the procedure for storing information and its provision to special services by the organizers of the exchange of information. In particular, we are talking about their duty to store data on the activity of their users for six months in Russia
Vedomosti:
The regulation describes a situation in which an Internet company can avoid having to store data, but then it will be obliged to provide special services with full access to its service on an ongoing basis. It turns out that in this case, law enforcement officers must themselves collect and store data for the past six months. According to the source “Vedomosti” in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, now there is no such technical possibility to store these data from the law enforcement agencies themselves, this will require budget expenditures. Comments FSB failed to get
If RAEC agrees on such acts, then in my opinion this would mean that our IT lobby has unfortunately not yet formed, which is very sad.
Based on:
"
RosKomSvoboda "
"
Kommersant "
"
Vedomosti "