The article contains a large number of links to other useful articles.
Similar articles with different ratings.
Often it happens that an article appears on the site and receives a certain public assessment in the pros / cons and comments. After some time, another article appears by another author on the same subject and receives a completely different public assessment. Sometimes, even the opposite. As an example, I can provide stories with a refund for Windows preinstalled on a laptop:
one and
two times . Interestingly, the comments on the first article had a mostly negative bias:
these $ 35 were not worth the time and nerves spent. ,
and to the second - positive -
personal gain is hardly noticeable, but the total amount of the public can be very significant.
However, after the publication of the second article, the assessment for the first article also became positive.
Similar comments to different articles, received different ratings.
Regarding the predictability of Alizar articles:
+143 In the text of the news accurately guessed by the author
and
-8. After reading the title, I immediately looked at the author.
or so:
+118 Why not just lay out, if only Half-Life 3 is not to do.
and
“+69 They will not think of anything, just not to do HL3!” - a phrase that threatens to become a duty officer ... ,
but
–3 What they just don’t think up, just not to make HL3.
Opposite estimates are similar to comments in one article.
After a few dozen comments in the topic with a large number of comments, plus / minus comments can even change the polarity.
')
Relationship karma and rating
According to the
post about Habré and Good, "as you can see, karma is mostly drained due to comments, and raised for written articles."
However, there are anomalies - and in this same article:
For this comment, plus, and karma just minus.
The article
In search of the perfect post also provides data on the evaluation of posts and comments.
In the
Habr Statistics article , data is collected about the most minted posts and comments, pervahs, anomalies, the most commented topic, etc.
Habrazhiteli and editors
A little research.
There was such a modest post.
The role of sleep in the context of personal effectiveness , which fell into the closet, but at the same time scored +24.
The above post inspired another user to the article
Sleep a little, but right? which became the second by zaplyusovannosti on Habré: +627! And this despite the fact that all data are taken from the encyclopedia / Internet. Those. This is not a translation, not a project in the field of science and technology, programming, but just a set of tips. Not a single technology or mechanism that makes life easier. Even photos and videos for clarity, no.
Recently, I wrote a post about the achievements of modern science in the field of sleep, where I described the light alarm clocks; a mask for realizing oneself asleep and managing sleep, like the film “The Beginning”; mask for polyphasic sleep - to wake up always vigorous and sleep; about the correspondence of brain impulses in a dream to specific images. The post contained a large number of relevant photos and videos. Unfortunately, the post was for some reason removed by the administration as eroding the policy of the site, and I was banned for a week.
However, the post
Discovery of the Outgoing Year was soon written
- another useful sleep function that does not contain any research and does not tell about any invention, does not contain photos and videos, which did not prevent him from dialing +89.
findings
1. Opinion of a society can change.
2. A few have read a similar previous article or all the comments in the article.
3. Consider constructive criticism as a means of your possible growth.