Actually the designer (wrote that the presenter) of the uCoz company heads the list of finalists:

I must say that of all her works, this is the best. To the rest were negative comments from visitors. Therefore, the final is not dedicated solely to this man.
Initially, in the comments to the work were claims of other participants due to the fact that the employee is officially involved, and her superiors judge. There were also objections to the fact that her work was completed 9 days before the announcement of the competition itself.
Functionality is not fully drawn. The right column is clamped at the most do not want. In dates for posts used months with a short name. The remaining 8 months, for which the name of the month is 2 times longer, no longer fit. In the news somewhere, alignment to the left, and somewhere in format. The girl did not align the pagination and close the hole at the bottom of the site. She can, she is a colleague. It is strange that the cap does not use the logo of the native company.
Note: if you make a block like "Our faces", then it is more correct to place the avatar first, and then the text. People are primarily attracted by faces and images, and then we follow from left to right to the text.

Grayness Functionally something incomprehensible. Especially the top menu (where is the emphasis on the "Create Blog" button?), Pagination. I would align the pagination with the center, and raise the right column so that the rubrics are on par with the news, and the search is on the pagination.
In the news the name of the author should not be above the title. The name of the section is located where we are waiting for the button "More", "More" incomprehensible. Secondary information (date, views) are taken to the place where we start reading. She is not so important.

Rather outdated visual work. Why is the current date at the top?
The logo is out of the general style and has a glossy glare (like the “Create a Blog” button). In the logo itself, they squeezed the link “All projects”, which fights with the very name “Official block”. Still, the bright blue color attracts more attention.
Above the title of each entry is the author, the number of views. Headings themselves are mostly in 2 lines and underlined. Such underlining looks unusual and ridiculous. As in any printed matter, you need to place the title, and at the bottom of it emphasize 1 die.
Social likes are not needed here. We can not say that we like this article, reading only the title and introductory text? The "full text" suggests thoughts about fat people. Better "Read more" or "Read more."

Typography neahti. Pictures of posts, as in the case of the authors, should be placed on the left. Otherwise, we “run” with our gaze to the picture, and then we have to return to the description to the left against the usual eye movement.
Tip: If you have long headers and you want to use a large font size, then use special narrowed fonts, for example, Roboto Condensed. These styles are specifically designed for these situations.

I do not think that this is 1 out of 21 finalists. There is a hole at the bottom.

About posting pictures in posts wrote above. Section labels take up too much vertical space, are too catchy and should be in a different hierarchy. All important functions for the visitor: a list of categories, search, button "Create a blog" (brings profit to the company), user profile - hidden or moved down.

This is bad. Menu rubrics in 2 levels (they are not subordinate), the search is poorly noticeable. Part of the functionality is not drawn. With different lengths of materials, the user will constantly strain the brain, scanning the screen in search of headings. Despite their fatness, they will be located at different levels and the eyes will move like this / \ / \ / \ = / \.

Footer failed. In all blocks there are different indents. If you read the text inscriptions, then a lot of crazy stuff. In heder and footer chaotic arrangement of elements to fill the space. The arrangement of the elements in the design should guide the user around the screen as a guide to the museum, telling the story.

Too pale. In some places, elements in general cannot be distinguished from the background. Center alignment should not be used in this case. Every time the eye needs to look for the beginning of the line. The author, views and date are not so important as to place them just before the recording itself. In general, boring and fast.

5 years ago it would look good. About the pictures to the records and authors wrote above. From mobile devices on the links will get only true snipers. Even on a Wacom touchpad, you have to aim. "And then even more interesting ..." can be replaced by "More" or "Read more" without raping the visitor's brain.

If you replace blue with green, then there will be a design for the New Year's site. Attack on the brain in red. If a lot is highlighted, nothing is highlighted. Each red dot encourages a glance to yourself. The text is not very readable. The cap is large, but it has little functionality. I would remove the zebra (background alternation) from the menu and squeeze in the entries (adding more air). In the footer, it is stuck like a horrible to take a place.
The rest of the work will not describe, so as not to take up much space.