Better 10 times at a time than never 10 times.
In the development of articles start-ups , sharing of skins ... and how to find a partner .. ...
If we are going to organize a startup and form a development team for a project share - is it better to take fewer people with a larger share or more people with a smaller one?
We are talking about the project at the stage of the idea and selection of the team. Suppose the idea has common sense and a monetization scheme.
Each participant is going to invest in the project their time and work. And now there is a choice that a better percentage in the project or greater project reliability is better.
I will explain the terms:
reliability - the likelihood that the project will be completed, launched, and promoted according to the business plan.
Unreliability - if the project does not start, or does not unwind properly, or it will be bypassed by competitors who copied the same idea from it. It is no secret that the return on the project due to the details and shortcomings at the development and launch stages may differ by an order of magnitude and more.
If the project participants receive a larger percentage means their total number is small, it means they have to combine several areas of work (or even skip some). For example: programmer and coder, designer and advertiser and copywriter, administrator and lawyer and economist ...
Those. one direction where you are an expert and plus another one or two where you are not “0” at best.
Thus, a large number of weak points arise in the project. It's no secret that any system works at the level of the weakest link in the system. And if there are several, the project is simply unreliable.
Now back to the beginning, what is better than 3% in a reliable project, where each task is performed by a specialist or 30% in a project, where 60% of tasks are solved by amateurs?
')
I for myself (step on greed and) choose 3%.
The project in which I am busy and which will be a service for organizing startups and selecting a team will be built according to the maximum reliability scheme. Description here , wishing not to miss the launch register here .
If we are going to organize a startup and form a development team for a project share - is it better to take fewer people with a larger share or more people with a smaller one?
We are talking about the project at the stage of the idea and selection of the team. Suppose the idea has common sense and a monetization scheme.
Each participant is going to invest in the project their time and work. And now there is a choice that a better percentage in the project or greater project reliability is better.
I will explain the terms:
reliability - the likelihood that the project will be completed, launched, and promoted according to the business plan.
Unreliability - if the project does not start, or does not unwind properly, or it will be bypassed by competitors who copied the same idea from it. It is no secret that the return on the project due to the details and shortcomings at the development and launch stages may differ by an order of magnitude and more.
If the project participants receive a larger percentage means their total number is small, it means they have to combine several areas of work (or even skip some). For example: programmer and coder, designer and advertiser and copywriter, administrator and lawyer and economist ...
Those. one direction where you are an expert and plus another one or two where you are not “0” at best.
Thus, a large number of weak points arise in the project. It's no secret that any system works at the level of the weakest link in the system. And if there are several, the project is simply unreliable.
Now back to the beginning, what is better than 3% in a reliable project, where each task is performed by a specialist or 30% in a project, where 60% of tasks are solved by amateurs?
')
I for myself (step on greed and) choose 3%.
The project in which I am busy and which will be a service for organizing startups and selecting a team will be built according to the maximum reliability scheme. Description here , wishing not to miss the launch register here .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/19536/
All Articles