📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Caution, radiation!

Do you like old photo equipment? Appreciate the old rare glass, giving a beautiful picture? Prefer time-tested glass and iron lenses? Look at the list at the end of the article. If you have one of the above - you are doomed.

radioactive

It all started with a comment to the review of a photographic lens, the lenses of which contain thorium oxide
- This lens has a radiation background! Somehow I was going to buy this thing, but a very competent and sane (I bought more than one lens from him) the seller did not advise him because of the background.
')
Just do not rush to swallow the taren, not read to the end.


Everything is relative.


mamiya Probably, if they were still produced, the phrase “LENS CAN BE THE CAUSE OF CANCER DISEASES” to meet modern standards would be an integral attribute of its advertising.

The statement that some photographic lenses possess ionizing radiation is generally true, and one can verify this with the aid of a device for measuring the power of such radiation.

Here is a good visual example:
Pentax 50mm f / 1.4 SMC Takumar


Come on?


Really, radioactive. There's a piece of thorium in the glass. The usual such radioactive thorium . It literally tears apart , which flies at you at a furious pace in your face while you are looking at the model in the viewfinder.
thorium-core
With a monstrous speed - tens of thousands of kilometers per second. Do you even know how they affect the cells of living organisms?

And it would seem, what have the wild ghouls?
fallout_cosplay_ghoul



And what to do?


Use the lens as intended. Set to camera and take pictures. Alpha particles are heavy, do not fly far and quickly lose energy. Not only will they get stuck in a centimeter of air, they also do not pierce the surface layer of the skin. Danger occurs only when ingested. You will not eat it, right? Although even in this case, the radiation does not threaten you. You will be cut by debris, and death from bleeding will occur sooner than in the body a sufficient dose of radiation is distributed so that his organs are affected by radiation sickness.



But what about the danger?


Depends on the ultimate goals. If you are looking for a lens that can be attached to the body of a living creature with a back lens for a long time - I would advise you to choose another model.

Can I take off my protective suit?


kalium-40-activity Of course not. Even the natural products that you eat also contain radioactive isotopes in some quantities. For example, a typical medium sized banana contains as much Kalia-40 as it does in your lens. Just think that there is another kind of decay. This is RADIATION .

There are many articles on radiation that surrounds us in everyday life. Sources can be not only glass with thorium, but also other various products: watches, household appliances, cars and even toys made from recycled toys for children.


The previous version of the article can be found here .

PS: List of lenses with a radiation background
Taken with camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Radioactive_lenses :

Canon FL 58mm f / 1.2
Canon FL 50mm f / 1.8
Canon FD 17mm f / 4
Canon FD 35mm f / 2.0 (1970's versions from the early)
Canon FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Aspherical (Measured at 46532 CPM @ front element)
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 55mm f1.4 (measured at 2360 nSv / h)
Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50mm f1.8 "Zebra"
Carl Zeiss Jena Biometar 80mm f2.8 "Zebra" "(Only P6 mount version)
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 50mm f4 "Zebra" "(Only P6 mount version)
Focal (Kmart store brand) 35mm f / 2.8
Fujica Fujinon 50mm f / 1.4 non-EBC (Measured at 35137 CPM @ back element)
Fujica Fujinon 50mm f / 1.4 EBC
GAF Anscomatic 38mm f / 2.8 (GAF Anscomatic 726 camera)
Industar 61 L / Z MC (L is for Lanthanum - radioactive element)
Kodak Aero-Ektars (various models)
Kodak Ektanon 4-inch Projection Lens f / 3.5
Nikkor 35mm f / 1.4 (early variant with thorium glass elements)
Olympus Zuiko Auto-S 1: 1.2 / 55 mm (first version with thorium glass elements)
Olympus Zuiko Auto-S 1: 1,4 / 50 mm (only the first version of "Silvernose" is Radioactive)
Pentax Super Takumar 35mm f / 2 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f / 1.4 (Asahi Optical Co.)
SMC Takumar 35mm f / 2.0 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Super Takumar 35mm f / 2.0 (Asahi Optical Co.)
SMC Takumar 50mm f / 1.4 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Super Takumar 50mm f / 1.4 (Only latest Version 2)
Super Takumar 55mm f / 1.8 (Asahi Optical Co.)
SMC Takumar 55mm f / 1.8 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Super Takumar 55mm f / 2.0 (Asahi Optical Co.)
SMC Takumar 55mm f / 2.0 (Asahi Optical Co.)
SMC Takumar 85mm f / 1.8 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Super Takumar 6x7 105mm f2.4 (Asahi Optical Co.)
Steinheil Auto-Quinon 55mm f / 1.9 KE mount
Topcor RE GN 50 / 1.4 (Lanthanum glass)
Topcor UV 50mm f / 2
Yashinon-DS 50mm f1.4 (Yashica) (Measured at 680 nSv / h)
Yashinon-DS 50mm f1.7 (Yashica) (Measured at 762 nSv / h)
Yashinon-DX 50mm f / 1.4 (Yashica) (Measured at 1359 nSv / h)
Yashinon-DS-M 50mm f / 1.4 (Yashica) (Measured at 572 nSv / h)
Yashinon-DS-M 50mm f / 1.7 (Yashica) (Measured at 798 nSv / h)
Yashinon DS-M 55mm f / 1.2 (Yashica) (Measured at 1056 nSv / h)
Yashinon 55mm f1.2 (Tomioka) (Measured at 981 nSv / h)
Leitz Wetzlar Summicron 5cm f2 (M39)
Vivitar Series 1 28mm f1.9
Voigtlander 50mm Nokton Prominent
Zenitar-M 50mm f1.7 (Lanthanum glass)

A few more experiments with lenses

Interesting articles on the topic and not only
Allowance for citizens “Caution! Radiation"
Principle of sufficient reason
Inductive evidence method
The paradox of the ravens , illustrating that inductive logic sometimes comes into conflict with intuition.

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/190882/


All Articles