Using content in the comments
Today I discovered Habrcodex, and its fourth paragraph. And for some reason I wanted to express my thoughts on this topic.
I'll start with the fact that I am the most vybeshivaet.
This is when in swear words the letters are replaced with asterisks. It seems that this word loses its meaning, or everyone ceases to understand them. For me, this method of dealing with mate is real ferdiperdosity.
I very clearly understand that clogging up his speech with obscene words leads to impoverishment of thinking, a person simply gets used to call all objects and phenomena of the world around him a set of four words. But I am by no means against it when mat is used to enhance the meaning of what has been said. And that is why I support fighters with obscene language. After all, precisely because the mat is not accepted by public morality, we have a linguistic tool that enables us to express the extremes of our emotions. (A series of South Park about shit remember? When the word shit came into circulation). There is even such a joke about Russian in nature.
')
In one thing, I very much agree with Theme Lebedev. The moderate and appropriate use of the mat in speech speaks of the psychological stability of a person. After all, in fact there are two applications of obscene language:
- to insult a person.
- to express your thoughts.
The first, in my opinion is not permissible, under any circumstances (remember, we are talking about adequate people) because it breaks all the constructiveness of the dispute. With insults, the person as if says: “That's it, I have no more arguments as a matter of fact, and now I turn to the personal one,” that is, in fact, the argument has been lost. And later, if you insult a person, you can hardly be rehabilitated in his eyes. The earth, as they say, is round, and personal insults are remembered for a long time.
The second use of the mat is completely justified. Based on the theses indicated earlier.
Summing up, I would like to say that both fighters for the “purity” of the language are right and lovers to screw up strong words. The second without the first did not have something to screw, and the first without the second had nothing to fight with.
I'll start with the fact that I am the most vybeshivaet.
This is when in swear words the letters are replaced with asterisks. It seems that this word loses its meaning, or everyone ceases to understand them. For me, this method of dealing with mate is real ferdiperdosity.
I very clearly understand that clogging up his speech with obscene words leads to impoverishment of thinking, a person simply gets used to call all objects and phenomena of the world around him a set of four words. But I am by no means against it when mat is used to enhance the meaning of what has been said. And that is why I support fighters with obscene language. After all, precisely because the mat is not accepted by public morality, we have a linguistic tool that enables us to express the extremes of our emotions. (A series of South Park about shit remember? When the word shit came into circulation). There is even such a joke about Russian in nature.
')
In one thing, I very much agree with Theme Lebedev. The moderate and appropriate use of the mat in speech speaks of the psychological stability of a person. After all, in fact there are two applications of obscene language:
- to insult a person.
- to express your thoughts.
The first, in my opinion is not permissible, under any circumstances (remember, we are talking about adequate people) because it breaks all the constructiveness of the dispute. With insults, the person as if says: “That's it, I have no more arguments as a matter of fact, and now I turn to the personal one,” that is, in fact, the argument has been lost. And later, if you insult a person, you can hardly be rehabilitated in his eyes. The earth, as they say, is round, and personal insults are remembered for a long time.
The second use of the mat is completely justified. Based on the theses indicated earlier.
Summing up, I would like to say that both fighters for the “purity” of the language are right and lovers to screw up strong words. The second without the first did not have something to screw, and the first without the second had nothing to fight with.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/18466/
All Articles