The Division is a console project that can be released on PC

In the comments to the previous and very controversial publication “Did the texture kill the texture?” , Where the project “The Division” was mentioned, the opinion was expressed about the low share of the PC market in relation to consoles.
Ubisoft has offered gamers a special way to bring this game to the personal computer market. Through a petition. This was reported to us by the famous British resource Rock Paper Shotgun.

At the moment, wishing to see the game on the PC is already 94,423. The more (richer the voices) it will be - the higher the chance to see the game on the PC.
')
To achieve the goal, no wallets, credit cards, or prepayments are needed - just participate in the petition . It is easy and fast.


Note: To the Habr administration, all sympathizers and already faced with the problem of restrictions in 1000 characters on the “publication header”.

You can somehow make it so that when counting the number of characters in the header of any publication, links are not taken into account. Then, that if you need to briefly and meticulously give a set of links that better reveal the news of this process - it turns into hell. In this case, I had to specify the sources that have the following link length:

www.dsogaming.com/news/ubisoft-asks-pc-gamers-to-show-interest-about-the-division-petition-almost-hits-its-initial-goal

The mention of two or three such links in the body of the “caps” of news or publications dramatically reduces the number of lines. Many users of Habr do not want "under the cat" - and they have enough links from the "caps". It turns out, in my opinion, some flaw that degrades the quality of information presentation. Brevity is a wonderful thing. But not when, it is necessary to do it “in ten words”, due to the fact that the corresponding references to the accompanying publications are too long.


Note 2: Many thanks to all those who find errors and report them. And a small request to these good people. If you find any mistake, please do not write one word “to be” marked “error in the article”. Not that I am an ungrateful bastard, but I don’t have time to crawl in all respects, looking for this typo. Therefore, it would be great if the errors were given in context. Thank you for understanding.