Diligent regions are pulled to the bottom
It seems to be two weeks after the results of the election. But the sediment remained. Bright minds have guessed to get tsikovskie data and twist them in every way. You know, sometimes in the process of such an exploration, so many interesting things emerge. I was watching.
The correlation between voter turnout and the share of votes for a party by region really enters into a stupor. Well, let's say, if you show this picture to my mother, who does not understand statistics, and the correlation only guesses the meaning of the word, and so, I think, she will draw quite definite conclusions.
Since the proportions of parties in the total amount to 100% (although we remember that in Mordovia they easily step over such arithmetic archaism), then naturally, with an increase in one prevalent share, the others will decrease.
')
Of course, this is insanity. Obviously. And these diagrams only visualize the power and strength that bends us.
A similar analysis of the elections in Canada in 2006. Do you see any engagement? This is exactly the situation with the purity of the experiment - without interventions and other dirty rubbish.
Comrade podmoskovnik makes a paradoxical conclusion: the percentage of turnout in the district is almost equal to the share of edrosov in this area. All this comes from the above data. When I try to physically present this data in my head, the brain begins to pop and a little nauseated. That is, the fewer people came to the polls, the less there were fraud and other success of the EP.
It is good that not all regions are so diligent. For your district, though not ashamed.
PS For the idea and data cleaning, bow to the blog altzgamer
(details on my blog)
The correlation between voter turnout and the share of votes for a party by region really enters into a stupor. Well, let's say, if you show this picture to my mother, who does not understand statistics, and the correlation only guesses the meaning of the word, and so, I think, she will draw quite definite conclusions.
Since the proportions of parties in the total amount to 100% (although we remember that in Mordovia they easily step over such arithmetic archaism), then naturally, with an increase in one prevalent share, the others will decrease.
')
Of course, this is insanity. Obviously. And these diagrams only visualize the power and strength that bends us.
A similar analysis of the elections in Canada in 2006. Do you see any engagement? This is exactly the situation with the purity of the experiment - without interventions and other dirty rubbish.
Comrade podmoskovnik makes a paradoxical conclusion: the percentage of turnout in the district is almost equal to the share of edrosov in this area. All this comes from the above data. When I try to physically present this data in my head, the brain begins to pop and a little nauseated. That is, the fewer people came to the polls, the less there were fraud and other success of the EP.
It is good that not all regions are so diligent. For your district, though not ashamed.
PS For the idea and data cleaning, bow to the blog altzgamer
(details on my blog)
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/17777/
All Articles