Blocking a resource by the decision of the prosecutor's office
Colleagues,
Faced here with another marasmus in a situation where the site is blocked by the valiant guards of law and order. Blocked, of course, by IP-address (DPI did not hear, as usual).
The funny thing is that in the registry of prohibited resources, the IP address of the server or any site from this server is not.
')
This is the story below.
Plot
IP is banned, as far as I know, only in%% of single-provider%. It looks like the provider’s own stub (by the way, they say that through some Megaphones and so on, it’s also a stub% of one_clarified provider%, I can’t verify the truthfulness, there’s no faith to customers).
Technical support% of one_large_provider% sends the hoster to the office (!) To understand, by phone they persistently refuse to report anything. The hoster found a certain electronic address, wrote there. Is waiting.
Customers who contact the hoster's advice in the support of the provider also have no information other than “contact the hoster”.
One was generally told an official request to write in writing and they would be answered about the reasons and reasons for blocking within a month.
Emotions
The most interesting is that the hoster, in turn, did not receive any notification, no request from the authorities to block any resource on this server - nothing. I learned everything from customers.
At random (practically), we managed to find out that IP was blocked “by decision of the prosecutor’s office” because of one site. They are happy to block the site, only now no one wrote to the hoster, did not ask to block. The site, by the way, is quite civil, about online casinos (not child porn, I mean).
The system works! From my side it looks like this:
Prosecutor's office provider: Hi, block the site% site%, here's a subpoena, which will be tomorrow.
Provider: OK, IP is blocked. Have a nice work.
Summary
The insanity of history is that, despite the introduction of a single registry and other “control of the Internet”, as before, all structures (both government agencies and providers) operate according to their internalconcepts and regulations. There is no centralized scheme of work with hosters, Internet providers. I am not the first to notice this, but I encountered the deadlock of the system for the first time.
So I wonder who faced this? How did you decide? What do you think? And in general, is it worth talking about it again? :)
All addresses and domains are hidden compliance etiquette for.
Faced here with another marasmus in a situation where the site is blocked by the valiant guards of law and order. Blocked, of course, by IP-address (DPI did not hear, as usual).
The funny thing is that in the registry of prohibited resources, the IP address of the server or any site from this server is not.
')
This is the story below.
Plot
IP is banned, as far as I know, only in%% of single-provider%. It looks like the provider’s own stub (by the way, they say that through some Megaphones and so on, it’s also a stub% of one_clarified provider%, I can’t verify the truthfulness, there’s no faith to customers).
Technical support% of one_large_provider% sends the hoster to the office (!) To understand, by phone they persistently refuse to report anything. The hoster found a certain electronic address, wrote there. Is waiting.
Customers who contact the hoster's advice in the support of the provider also have no information other than “contact the hoster”.
One was generally told an official request to write in writing and they would be answered about the reasons and reasons for blocking within a month.
Emotions
The most interesting is that the hoster, in turn, did not receive any notification, no request from the authorities to block any resource on this server - nothing. I learned everything from customers.
At random (practically), we managed to find out that IP was blocked “by decision of the prosecutor’s office” because of one site. They are happy to block the site, only now no one wrote to the hoster, did not ask to block. The site, by the way, is quite civil, about online casinos (not child porn, I mean).
The system works! From my side it looks like this:
Prosecutor's office provider: Hi, block the site% site%, here's a subpoena, which will be tomorrow.
Provider: OK, IP is blocked. Have a nice work.
Summary
The insanity of history is that, despite the introduction of a single registry and other “control of the Internet”, as before, all structures (both government agencies and providers) operate according to their internal
So I wonder who faced this? How did you decide? What do you think? And in general, is it worth talking about it again? :)
All addresses and domains are hidden compliance etiquette for.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/175173/
All Articles