Comparison Browser css3 & html5
I have not seen articles about browsers comparison for a long time, in connection with the disc that has flown, I thought, and maybe move from ff to something else (everyone is used to looking for the best).
It became interesting who is now leading the market. The easiest way to take and compare what else to do.
I looked through a number of articles on hml5 account:
HTML5 Technology Check
How to test web browser for compatibility with HTML5?
Test and compare five web browsers in Windows 7 and OS X Mountain Lion
Test and compare web browsers: Chrome 20, Opera 12, Firefox 13
Test and compare web browsers | Top five
')
Comparison may not always be adequate in connection with the use of various services and tests. For the test, the following services were used:
Maze solver
css3test.com
CSS3 Selectors Test
Acid3
html5test
Test2
peacekeeper
So drove.
From the 41 selectors 41 have passed, 0 are buggy and 0 are unsupported (Passed 574 out of 574 tests)
Summary table for FF results
In order not to litter the post with a mass of pictures, I will lay out only the summary table.
Thanks btd for Safari results
Surprised by a test on peacekeepers, the guys tried. The interesting fact that the 1st run test is very different from the 2nd one, maybe the cache is so influential, but the question is very controversial.
It was also very strange to see the search algorithm for finding a way out of the maze in FF, Opera, Chrome had the same exit algorithm, but IE does not look for easy ways and did not go like everything (although it ran the test 3-4 times the same maze ). The final table is probably the best chrome, and then the devil's leg will break, in general, see for yourself:
PS No one is flawless, spelling and mistakes, I ask you for mercy in a personal.
PPS If anyone has a desire to protest Safari.
PPPS Added IE10 surprised in part, but only in part ...
Thanks btd for Safari results
PPPPS sent friend IE10 results under win8
It became interesting who is now leading the market. The easiest way to take and compare what else to do.
I looked through a number of articles on hml5 account:
HTML5 Technology Check
How to test web browser for compatibility with HTML5?
Test and compare five web browsers in Windows 7 and OS X Mountain Lion
Test and compare web browsers: Chrome 20, Opera 12, Firefox 13
Test and compare web browsers | Top five
')
Comparison may not always be adequate in connection with the use of various services and tests. For the test, the following services were used:
Css:
Maze solver
css3test.com
CSS3 Selectors Test
Acid3
Html5
html5test
Test2
peacekeeper
So drove.
FF 18.0.2
Maze Solver - CSS3 Layout Performance Test
Css3test.com
CSS3 Selectors Test
From the 41 selectors 41 have passed, 0 are buggy and 0 are unsupported (Passed 574 out of 574 tests)
Acid3
html5test
Test2
Peacekeeper
Summary table for FF results
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 136 seconds |
| css3test.com | 56% (500/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 393/500 (+10) |
| wapsbttest2 | 129/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 798 (5/7) |
| peacekeeper2 | 1514 (5/7) |
Opera 12.14
In order not to litter the post with a mass of pictures, I will lay out only the summary table.
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 16 seconds |
| css3test.com | 58% (451/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 404/500 (+9) |
| wapsbttest2 | 146/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 2441 (2/7) |
| peacekeeper2 | 2522 (4/7) |
Chrome 24.0.1312.57
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 6.9 seconds |
| css3test.com | 63% (562/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 448/500 (+13) |
| wapsbttest2 | 148/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 1734 (6/7) |
| peacekeeper2 | 3127 (6/7) |
IE 9.0.8112.16421 64-bit
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 22 seconds |
| css3test.com | 33% (274/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 138/500 (+5) |
| wapsbttest2 | 91/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 998 (3/7) |
| peacekeeper2 | 1001 (3/7) |
IE 10.0.9200.16438 64-bit
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 24 seconds |
| css3test.com | 54% (444/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 320/500 (+6) |
| wapsbttest2 | 127/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 1882 (3/7) |
| peacekeeper2 | 1882 (3/7) |
Safary Version 6.0.2 (8536.26.17), max osx 10.8
Thanks btd for Safari results
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 6.9 seconds |
| css3test.com | 55% (500/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 378/500 (+8) |
| wapsbttest2 | 139/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 3117 (3/6) |
| peacekeeper2 | 3117 (3/6) |
Conclusions and total for all
Surprised by a test on peacekeepers, the guys tried. The interesting fact that the 1st run test is very different from the 2nd one, maybe the cache is so influential, but the question is very controversial.
It was also very strange to see the search algorithm for finding a way out of the maze in FF, Opera, Chrome had the same exit algorithm, but IE does not look for easy ways and did not go like everything (although it ran the test 3-4 times the same maze ). The final table is probably the best chrome, and then the devil's leg will break, in general, see for yourself:
| Browser | FF | Opera | Chrome | IE | IE10 | Safari |
| Css3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 136 seconds | 16 seconds | 6.9 seconds | 22 seconds | 24 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
| css3test.com | 56% (500/937) | 58% (451/937) | 63% (562/937) | 33% (274/937) | 54% (444/937) | 55% (500/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 | 41/41 574/574 | 41/41 574/574 | 41/41 574/574 | 41/41 574/574 | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | ||||||
| html5test | 393/500 (+10) | 404/500 (+9) | 448/500 (+13) | 138/500 (+5) | 320/500 (+6) | 378/500 (+8) |
| wapsbttest2 | 129/160 | 146/160 | 148/160 | 91/160 | 127/160 | 139/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 798 (3/7) | 2441 (2/7) | 1734 (6/7) | 998 (3/7) | 1820 (3/7) | 3117 (3/7) |
| peacekeeper | 1514 (5/7) | 2522 (4/7) | 3127 (6/7) | 1001 (3/7) | 1882 (3/7) | 3117 (3/7) |
PS No one is flawless, spelling and mistakes, I ask you for mercy in a personal.
PPS If anyone has a desire to protest Safari.
PPPS Added IE10 surprised in part, but only in part ...
Thanks btd for Safari results
PPPPS sent friend IE10 results under win8
| Css3 | |
|---|---|
| ie.microsoft.com | 16 seconds |
| css3test.com | 54% (444/937) |
| tools.css3.info | 41/41 574/574 |
| acid3 | 100/100 |
| Html5 | |
| html5test | 320/500 (+6) |
| wapsbttest2 | 127/160 |
| peacekeeper1 | 3476 (2/7)) |
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/169287/
All Articles