📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Robotism - futurological forecast

image
At one time, Marx argued that capitalism would be replaced by communism, and the oppressed class — the proletariat — would come to power. In my opinion, this assumption is quite controversial, even if all IT specialists are ranked in this class. After all, after the slave system, slaves did not come to power, and after feudalism, the peasants did.
But even leaving the views of Marx (along with other inconsistencies) on his conscience, the question nevertheless remains - what will happen after capitalism? Reflecting on this, I am convinced that the next formation will most likely be called ROBOTISM, or something like that.

What Marx was right about is that the change of order by revolution occurs only when a certain revolutionary situation develops in society. In other words, when society matures for this, not before. Attempts to accelerate to anything good did not lead - the system sooner or later rolls back to the previous level. Therefore, first of all, we need to pay attention to how society will change in terms of creating prerequisites for a revolutionary situation, and what this will ultimately lead us to.
Allow me to describe, in my opinion, the most likely scenario of creating a revolutionary situation. As usual, the basis of everything is the scientific and technical progress.



image
')
Here comes the revolutionary situation. Releasing a huge amount of labor will lead to massive unemployment. Not 7-11% as it is now, but 30-50-70%, and the percentage will grow steadily. The unemployed are the driving force of the new revolution and the change of the social system.

I do not think that any significant influence will be gained by movements that limit scientific and technical progress, like the Luddites . But the state, if it does not want barricades, will have to introduce new rules that legally fix lifelong provision for life-long unemployed, introduce additional taxes and, as a result, reduce the competitiveness of their own goods.

So what will happen to the competitiveness of goods in the era of universal robots? It is logical that the introduction of universal robots by an enterprise will lead to an increase in the efficiency and release of workers. This will lead later to tax increases. Taxes will depend on the number of unemployed and on living standards. It is not difficult to guess that the winners will be those states where there are fewer residents, which will be based on qualified personnel - managers and engineers.

Such states will be able to repeatedly scale their own production, reduce taxes, increasing production and again reduce taxes. I personally see South Korea as the first candidate for the role of such an economic superstate. This country already has the highest labor productivity, an excellent investment climate, a good education and a powerful, even disproportionate, presence in the global economy.

In Russia, unfortunately, the prospects are poorly viewed. The factor of minerals, the sale of which on the one hand enriches officials, on the other, reduces the competitiveness of industrial goods (indirectly, through overestimation of production costs), already now does not help the development of the country. In the future, with the development of technology, this role, I suppose, will decline. The absence of an attractive investment climate, the rudimentary traditions of management - all this does not add us any points either.

Let me summarize.

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/164741/


All Articles