
From time to time something finds something on me and I believe that “Man - it sounds proud!”. Then I return to the harsh reality, which proves that it’s the same thing.
My state (Ukraine) somehow decided to change such a thing as
KVED . The need for replacement is clear - over time, new activities appear, existing ones are divided into subgroups or merged, etc. It is necessary to update - it means it is necessary. There is a
one-to-one correspondence between old and new KVEDov. There is a law under which everyone should switch to new KVEDs by 2013.
Let's think about how this should be happening in a good way.
')
Theory
Somewhere at the end of 2012 a script of the form is launched in some state base:
UPDATE table_kved SET kved="X" WHERE kved="Y"
( , ), / « YYY. / — / -.». 99% . - — . !
- .
- . ( , , - , ).
- . . .
- . .
- . 10$.
- . . .
- .
- .
- . , .
- 2 .
- . . , , .
! ? 2 ? 4 (+2 ).
1.2 - ( 25 ). ? 126 !
( , — , — ).
10$ , ., , , . ? ? — , . , .
4 , 0.00001 …
P.S. , . -
-, -
,
- . , ?