Replacing D-Link Part II

Well then.
Tests have shown that the iron is quite a domonet for access points.
There are bugs of course, but pleased that the ports get into the unit without problems.
Cactus monitors the same normal. True, we did not understand whether there are 64bit counters or not.
It's hard to find 24 users who put gig in the shelf :)
There is a treasured command int e 0/1 - 24 which allows you to configure all the ports at once, which saves time.
I also liked the access-list on telnet. There are features ipv6, dhcp options 82, igmp. Now we will test.
What is missing. Banners! There are banners on tsiska, you come in and immediately see: ba, yes, it's merin or kolobok ...
Well, now still gorinich and kaschey have appeared :) And here it is not, more precisely, there are rudiments, sobs.
Banner example:
**************
* NET Name *
* host *
**************
Also useful feature sh cdp neig is missing. Network will have to draw hands.
Another flaw. Vlan1 does not remove. The port config is funny because of this:
- switchport access vlan 1,4037 remove
switchport access vlan 10 add
- In general, put it on the houses.
True, after a thorough snmp scan and so on, we lost the switch from the monitoring.
Tomorrow reboot, see if it comes to life ... But there was nothing to start snmpwalk from 3 hosts right away ...
Next ES4626 with two 10g and the possibility of mpls ...
Just expose to the tests. Soon there will be information.
And further. The switch bodies are made of 1mm galvanized iron ... Killed.