First impressions of Opera 9.5 Beta

Is the Windows release much more stable? than alpha, in my eyes no longer unstuck.
First impressions for half an hour of work:

[+]

- really faster!
- Fixed many unpleasant minor bugs on many popular sites.
- Google Reader no longer slows down; Google Docs also works as expected.
- From smooth-scrolling'a get up an important part of the body

[-]

- I was knocked down by the look of Gmail - some of the headers of the letters take up two lines, some - one. Solid gruel. Opera 9.24 everything is fine displayed. I can’t reach me in any way, how can I release (well, let's say beta-) browser assembly without checking how it displays the most popular postal services.
')
- As in the alpha versions, the Opera Start bar does not cover the Opera skin - this bar is just white. Trifle, but it looks so disgusting that I do not want to use this release.

- I installed not as an upgrade on top of 9.24, but in a separate, newly created directory. Opera somehow got my bookmarks from 9.24, only the opera6.adr file in 9.5b was for some reason ± 10 kb more. It was a little embarrassing - where did the 10 kb difference come from, where did the bookmarks themselves come from? And if the bookmarks, then why no other settings have been imported? Or something else was imported, and I do not know about it? Dumb.

In general, I will wait until Gmail starts to appear again. Everything else is pleased, in comparison with the alpha-build. Compared to 9.24, it is annoying to ignore some problems that obviously had to be solved in such a thorough new version as Kestrel (for example, the inability to drag some bars (for example, the Status bar ) to the desired place).
Waiting for the second major beta release.