What would you like to know and what we are taught in school?
Why the school does not teach life subjects? It would be nice to teach some elementary psychology, but not in its classical sense, but close to life.
For example, in adolescents in high school, as you know, transitional age. After all, you can tell them some elementary things that would help them decide on the search for themselves. Those. not to indicate to specific individuals their shortcomings, but to show everyone the whole multitude of possible options, their causes and consequences. Let the teenager himself decide, he chooses the path himself, but at least everyone will show him, tell and explain the consequences.
Or here we think how to increase the birth rate. I am silent about all the financial and other interfering factors, this is a separate conversation. I will consider only the problems in the family. Why not start talking about relationships back in school? Class so from the eighth, when it becomes relevant. To the institute, some couples are already getting married and if they know more about the psychology of each other, then many mistakes could have been avoided in advance. Including at the stage of choosing a pair. Why not? So many smart books, scientific works, films, why aren't children taught this? It is more useful because, than the lessons of the MHK, no one listens to them anyway.
What about etiquette lessons? Where did they go after the 19th century? True - what about etiquette in the working class? Scoop is the same. So it may already be time to return, then the grandmothers in the subway will give way, and abroad we will stop blushing for our own?
')
I can say lucky - I didn’t learn the history of composers at music lessons at school, but I watched new Prodigy videos, discussed jungle tracks, learned to play the synthesizer, divined instruments and effects in music. So the teacher himself decided, scoring on all school programs. We watched and discussed the work of different people and everyone had the right to speak. The more information we had, the more interesting, because it is better to look at all the problems from several points of view. So you can solve it most objectively, right?
And of course everyone understands why this will not happen - somewhere at the top everything is already long overdue according to standards, the number of hours and no one is interested in the psychological development of children.
For example, in adolescents in high school, as you know, transitional age. After all, you can tell them some elementary things that would help them decide on the search for themselves. Those. not to indicate to specific individuals their shortcomings, but to show everyone the whole multitude of possible options, their causes and consequences. Let the teenager himself decide, he chooses the path himself, but at least everyone will show him, tell and explain the consequences.
Or here we think how to increase the birth rate. I am silent about all the financial and other interfering factors, this is a separate conversation. I will consider only the problems in the family. Why not start talking about relationships back in school? Class so from the eighth, when it becomes relevant. To the institute, some couples are already getting married and if they know more about the psychology of each other, then many mistakes could have been avoided in advance. Including at the stage of choosing a pair. Why not? So many smart books, scientific works, films, why aren't children taught this? It is more useful because, than the lessons of the MHK, no one listens to them anyway.
What about etiquette lessons? Where did they go after the 19th century? True - what about etiquette in the working class? Scoop is the same. So it may already be time to return, then the grandmothers in the subway will give way, and abroad we will stop blushing for our own?
')
I can say lucky - I didn’t learn the history of composers at music lessons at school, but I watched new Prodigy videos, discussed jungle tracks, learned to play the synthesizer, divined instruments and effects in music. So the teacher himself decided, scoring on all school programs. We watched and discussed the work of different people and everyone had the right to speak. The more information we had, the more interesting, because it is better to look at all the problems from several points of view. So you can solve it most objectively, right?
And of course everyone understands why this will not happen - somewhere at the top everything is already long overdue according to standards, the number of hours and no one is interested in the psychological development of children.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/14632/
All Articles