SurfPatrol. Test interface?
We already wrote about SurfPatrol , a service for checking PC security . During these few months, we have seriously worked on its interface, and soon the service will receive an updated look. SurfPatrol was originally conceived as simple and understandable for the average user. We ask users to evaluate the new interface from this point of view. We will be happy and a barrel of honey, and a fly in the ointment :)
Achtung! A lot of pictures.
So, the main page with a small educational program on the need to check the browser - and the actual button for this action. To tell about the service in social networks, you can use special buttons. But how noticeable are they on the main page? ..
')
Having executed check - we get on the page of reports. Here you can see how (potentially) our current browser and all its plugins are susceptible to cyber intrusion. Buttons informers - active: by clicking on them, you can go to the official website of the browser or plug-in to download patches or updates.
If the user believes that the service has made a mistake, then this can be reported to the developers by clicking on the "Report Error" button. It is assumed that the user views the information on all components of the list to the end and at the bottom of the page sees this button. However, in the process of developing the interface, such an arrangement of the button caused an active discussion and many doubts. How successful, in your opinion, is the final version?
A forum has been implemented for interaction with the support service and communication within the community (only registered users can post messages).
In addition to the forum, you can get feedback and find answers to your questions in the Help section. There is a feedback form, contact information and FAQ.
The main doubt that has arisen with the developers of the interface is due to overload. Will the user be confused by the abundance of information on this page?
Finally, we add that we will be especially grateful for the reasoned and constructive criticism.
Achtung! A lot of pictures.
So, the main page with a small educational program on the need to check the browser - and the actual button for this action. To tell about the service in social networks, you can use special buttons. But how noticeable are they on the main page? ..
')
Having executed check - we get on the page of reports. Here you can see how (potentially) our current browser and all its plugins are susceptible to cyber intrusion. Buttons informers - active: by clicking on them, you can go to the official website of the browser or plug-in to download patches or updates.
If the user believes that the service has made a mistake, then this can be reported to the developers by clicking on the "Report Error" button. It is assumed that the user views the information on all components of the list to the end and at the bottom of the page sees this button. However, in the process of developing the interface, such an arrangement of the button caused an active discussion and many doubts. How successful, in your opinion, is the final version?
A forum has been implemented for interaction with the support service and communication within the community (only registered users can post messages).
In addition to the forum, you can get feedback and find answers to your questions in the Help section. There is a feedback form, contact information and FAQ.
The main doubt that has arisen with the developers of the interface is due to overload. Will the user be confused by the abundance of information on this page?
Finally, we add that we will be especially grateful for the reasoned and constructive criticism.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/145500/
All Articles