Twitter stood up for its user before the court of the state of New York
On Monday, the New York District Criminal Court received a Twitter lawyers request to reconsider a previously issued ruling requiring the service administration to disclose the personal data of a user known as Malcolm Harris, who has a Twitter call for street riots in New York. York during the Occupy Wall Street promotion. Twitter insists that state prosecutors misinterpret the Stored Communications Act, according to which an electronic communications provider who transmits and stores information must disclose some data regarding the provision of its services to a particular person.
Malcolm Harris’s problems began on January 30 of this year, when the Twitter administration received an official statement from the prosecutor of New York, which, in fact, required to disclose personal information about the user and his archive of messages from September 15, 2011. The administration of the service informed the user about the incoming request and filed a petition for its judicial cancellation. However, Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino on April 20 sided with the prosecutor of New York and the ruling remained in force.
In response to this situation, Twitter published its official document, which states that, according to the terms of use (ToS), the information that the user sends to the service is in one way or another his property, which the company cannot disclose to anyone should not. True, Twitter lawyers still admit that the user's personal data may in some case be subject to the Stored Communications Act (national security threat, terrorism, etc.), but tweets are the property of the account owner, and their safety and privacy must be unshakable in any case.
Malcolm Harris himself, along with several hundred other people, is accused of organizing an illegal action on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York on October 1, 2011 during the Occupy Wall Street action.
')
[ Source ]
Malcolm Harris’s problems began on January 30 of this year, when the Twitter administration received an official statement from the prosecutor of New York, which, in fact, required to disclose personal information about the user and his archive of messages from September 15, 2011. The administration of the service informed the user about the incoming request and filed a petition for its judicial cancellation. However, Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino on April 20 sided with the prosecutor of New York and the ruling remained in force.
In response to this situation, Twitter published its official document, which states that, according to the terms of use (ToS), the information that the user sends to the service is in one way or another his property, which the company cannot disclose to anyone should not. True, Twitter lawyers still admit that the user's personal data may in some case be subject to the Stored Communications Act (national security threat, terrorism, etc.), but tweets are the property of the account owner, and their safety and privacy must be unshakable in any case.
Malcolm Harris himself, along with several hundred other people, is accused of organizing an illegal action on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York on October 1, 2011 during the Occupy Wall Street action.
')
[ Source ]
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/143500/
All Articles