validator.w3.org
My small startup at the last stage of verification, checked the text, layout, version for mobile devices and, by habit, went to validator.w3.org . My strong surprise was to see a new, modern design ...
There were pleasant bookmarks, input was changed, another button was drawn, to replace the standard submit, and the button was hidden in the “More Options” menu. The design of the validator has lost sharp corners and basic colors. Now everything is smooth, all colors are soft, do not hurt the eyes. I would not say that it has become very expensive, but it has become more pleasant - a fact.
I use JS FrameWork "mootools", the "Check" button is present on the page twice. The first time as a submit with display: none ;, the second time as a link with a background, which we see on the screen. Tabs, respectively, are made up of a list, in general, everything seems to be inclined =)
Well done, I think. At the bottom, there are not enough 2 shields of “valid xhtml” and “valid css”;)) Speaking of birds, with a valid code, a new type of button appeared
There were pleasant bookmarks, input was changed, another button was drawn, to replace the standard submit, and the button was hidden in the “More Options” menu. The design of the validator has lost sharp corners and basic colors. Now everything is smooth, all colors are soft, do not hurt the eyes. I would not say that it has become very expensive, but it has become more pleasant - a fact.
I use JS FrameWork "mootools", the "Check" button is present on the page twice. The first time as a submit with display: none ;, the second time as a link with a background, which we see on the screen. Tabs, respectively, are made up of a list, in general, everything seems to be inclined =)
Well done, I think. At the bottom, there are not enough 2 shields of “valid xhtml” and “valid css”;)) Speaking of birds, with a valid code, a new type of button appeared
')
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/13910/
All Articles