I do not share the tribulation of MegaUpload

Frankly, the news of the closure of megauploadʻa pretty amused me. The creator has already been remembered by very recent statements that the service is completely unaffected, and it is protected along and across by American law and personal lawyers. The talk then, in general, was about this video, where all sorts of their stars sing, what a cool resource Kim Schmitz has.

Schmitz behaved unseasonably. If the provocative activities of some large torrent trackers can be explained by a kind of ideology (they say, free access to any information, everything), then in the case of MegaApload it is pure business, which, however, is not that bad, just more modest it would be necessary like other more successful file sharing.

They remembered the creator and a letter to PayPal, in which he knocked on competitors, and "gave advice" not to cooperate with them, while he himself, at the same time, was doing exactly the same thing.
Revenue from the resource was enough not only to pay for servers. Among the property of Dotcom many good and different, for example:
')


Yesterday Kim Dotkom pleaded not guilty. In general, it is noteworthy that this whole story happened the very next day after SOPA failed in the US Congress. There may be guys without SOP `s, and without PIP` s grab for the crotch unwanted.

Copyright must be respected within the framework of common sense, I believe.

And everything that happened with MegaUpload can be described with one word only - “dody ***** were”.