A bit about the "underwater satellite constellation"

Blog "space" did not find - a huge omission, in my opinion. So here.

After reading today another funny joke about the underwater grouping of GLONASS satellites, I decided to give one interesting link on Habré. There are such guys - spacelaunchreport.com - they monitor all space launches in the world. In their extremely interesting analytical report, you can find, for example, the following label - the number of space launches at cosmodromes for 2010 (the number of unsuccessful launches in brackets):

 Baikonur, Kazakhstan 24 (1)
 Cape Canaveral, Florida 9 (0) 
 XiChang, China 8 (0)   
 Kourou, French Guyana 6 (0)
 Plesetsk, Russia 6 (0)
 Jiuquan, China 4 (0)
 Kennedy Space Center, Florida 3 (0)  
 Vandenberg AFB, California 3 (0)
 Taiyaun, China 3 (0)   
 Sriharikota, India 3 (2) 
 Tanegashima, Japan 2 (0)      
 Dombarovsky, Russia 1 (0)         
 Palmachim, Israel 1 (0)      
 Naro Space Center, South Korea 1 (1)   

')
Yes, guys, from one Baikonur it is started more than from thought Canaveral, Sichan and Koura together. Given that from the same Kuru fly Russian "Unions".

This, however, does not interfere with the Internet Xperdam profoundly declare: “This disgrace (mass output of satellites to a given orbit under water) must be stigmatized, until the project is rehabilitated in the eyes of the public with its successes.” ( C ) soomrack

I would really like to ask “those who stigmatize” if they have praised successful launches with the same pathos, and why I haven’t been on the Internet for one of the 30 successful launches.