📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Comparative performance analysis of PCI-E SSD, SSD and HDD drives

Improving the performance of the disk subsystem is the most pressing issue today. This is due to the fact that HDD, due to its low cost, still occupies a leading position in the mass segment. In more than half of resource-intensive applications, the spindle disks become the bottleneck. In this case, everything depends not on the bandwidth of the SATA interface, but on the physical capabilities of the mechanical components of the magnetic disk. The bandwidth of SATA-II and SATA-III interfaces is 300MB / s and 600MB / s, respectively. And the maximum performance that a regular HDD can provide is not more than 150 MB / s. Therefore, the transition to the SATA-III interface will be justified only for SSD, and not for everyone.

To assess the effectiveness of disk subsystems of different types, the following solutions were chosen for testing:

1. OCZ RevoDrive X2 PCI-E SSD 100Gb

')
2. Plextor PX-128M2S SSD 128Gb


3. Transcend TS64GSSD25S-M SSD 64Gb
4. 4 x Transcend TS64GSSD25S-M RAID-0


5. WD Caviar Green SATA-II HDD 750Gb


6. 4 x WD RE4 1TB 7200RPM RAID-0


The following charts show the performance of solutions in different test modes:

Sequential



Random, 512KB



Random, 4KB, Queue Depth = 1



Random, 4KB, Queue Depth = 32



Access time



Windows System Performance Rating



Average solution cost



Average cost per gigabyte



From the test results we can make a series of conclusions:

Testing was carried out in the laboratory DEPO Computers

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/130466/


All Articles