About the mind, or Strong evidence of incompatibility with the Internet wording "Read fully" and its relatives
The announcements of the notes of most sites were automatically inserted, inserted and there will be inserted the links “Read full”, “Read more” (cool quotes).
Moreover, the contents of the notes, which these invitation formulations, bypassing one hundred or two hundred announcement signs, automatically hide by tackle (thank God, less and less often), were also automatically hidden, hidden and will be hidden (written at night hard).
Meanwhile, advocates who want to read further (fully and often) appeal to the user's inability to click on the header (or the developer’s inability to put it), as well as to the person’s intuitive desire to find something understandable (hence, it must be assumed, the “intuitive interface” went) a link that means exactly what it means (whereas the headings are invented by some compilers of phraseological dictionaries, by golly). But their opponents (opponents of defenders), whom (opponents) are still a minority, reasonably object that imposing such shortcomings and aspirations on the user is just the same as stating that the spermatozoon has abandoned the mind and eyes in order not to witness its own conception - a memory for a future user not the best.
')
And at how many meetings the whole meeting with “Read more” would not be put on the agenda, the situation would still not change: there was no obvious evidence. But now such evidence has appeared. Now, the jury must still confirm: from the screen you want to read less, partially or not at all.
A snapshot of an incredibly and obviously new Poster site, 2007 release.
Oftop: about blogs, they put Lev Danilkin in some blogs ! And they gave him a number - 21. Point.
Moreover, the contents of the notes, which these invitation formulations, bypassing one hundred or two hundred announcement signs, automatically hide by tackle (thank God, less and less often), were also automatically hidden, hidden and will be hidden (written at night hard).
Meanwhile, advocates who want to read further (fully and often) appeal to the user's inability to click on the header (or the developer’s inability to put it), as well as to the person’s intuitive desire to find something understandable (hence, it must be assumed, the “intuitive interface” went) a link that means exactly what it means (whereas the headings are invented by some compilers of phraseological dictionaries, by golly). But their opponents (opponents of defenders), whom (opponents) are still a minority, reasonably object that imposing such shortcomings and aspirations on the user is just the same as stating that the spermatozoon has abandoned the mind and eyes in order not to witness its own conception - a memory for a future user not the best.
')
And at how many meetings the whole meeting with “Read more” would not be put on the agenda, the situation would still not change: there was no obvious evidence. But now such evidence has appeared. Now, the jury must still confirm: from the screen you want to read less, partially or not at all.
A snapshot of an incredibly and obviously new Poster site, 2007 release.
Oftop: about blogs, they put Lev Danilkin in some blogs ! And they gave him a number - 21. Point.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/12262/
All Articles