How clever to become rich

Under this motto, on April 26, the Forum “Innovative Development through the Intellectual Property Market” was held in Moscow. I cannot say that I understood how rich the articles were, but what I remember after visiting the Forum.

• The Internet is a modern Gutenberg printing press. Then introduced copyright. Now the new challenge is to limit or not, if so, how.
• I propose to clarify the slogan of the Forum: "How clever to become rich and not die or sit down at the same time."
• In Germany, in the history of 30 thousand scientists, we have so much every year.
• Over the past 10 years, funding for R & D has increased 10 times in Russia, while the number of patents has increased 2 times.
• In Russia, there is no single committee on IP, it is engaged in 20 ministries and departments. China has an IP committee from the district center to Beijing.
• In China, one municipality has as many patents as all of Russia
• Yesterday, Medvedev shook Fursenko - why is he sleeping!
• Now in Russia, the indicators of success of universities are: dissertations, publications, conferences, the number of researchers per 1 article, the level of citation in scientific journals, ...
• In Soviet times, for 5 years they solved the tasks of launching into space, etc., and now they only discuss everything on the Forums.
• In total, the treasury for 2010 has intangible assets worth 9 million rubles. in 2007, the goal was stated to create ... (some very large number)
• In China, the share of innovative enterprises in GDP is 60%
• In Russia, 5% (of all enterprises of such 10%)
• Three whales of IP: protection, protection, use. If at least one died, then the IP does not work.
• Invention - on what progress is built. A patent is an exclusive right. The IP system is an incentive system for the inventor.
• 1753, the Empress decree: “This privilege is granted to this scholar, who allegedly was the first in Russia to invent this technology so that no official would give out to any other person ... to issue for 30 years.” It was Lomonosov.
• We need a system where every inventor will understand how he will receive "pleasure" for his discoveries and inventions.
• Russia's share - 0.3% of the global technology market. At 90m the volume of this market was 1 trillion. $, Now 14 trillion. $
• We need a single principle of working with trademarks in the customs union, otherwise there will be constant litigation.
• New Europe 2020 strategy - 40 pages, in the CIS - 400, the main focus of the document on the innovative union and youth.
• Both in Russia and in Europe they analyzed the experience of Silicon Valley. We came to the conclusion that we need to create a separate cluster, and launched Skolkovo. In Europe, they made the opposite conclusion - it is necessary to form open innovation hubs, not just one local one.
• In Europe, they have reached the next stage of development - a product for the market, not a market for a product.
• The state must protect society from "skorobogatyk"
• It is necessary to introduce an international court, and not to produce European, Asian, CIS, and then to think which of them is more important for Russia.
• Constant changes are reeling the judicial system.
• Putin: “the practice must be customized to the theory ... or vice versa"
• It is necessary to prepare a whole series of training programs for innovative managers.
• It is necessary to use the resources of the Far East - cheap energy, the whole periodic table .... otherwise we will lose it. It is necessary to create a special economic zone there.

This is practically the quotes of the speakers:

• Alexander Piskunov, Auditor of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation
• Vladimir Doroshkov, Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
• Vladimir N. Lopatin, Head of RNIIS
• Boris Simonov, Head of Rospatent
• Boris Pavlov, Vice-President, GazpromBank

In most cases, you can guess which of them said what, but because I can lie, leave this fascinating thing to the readers.