Last week we slowlyconducted the first examination of the state site: FGU FIPS.
The next in line according to the results of voting site www.gosuslugi.ru I invite users of all Habr to participate in the collective examination of the site. Required to evaluate:
Functional correspondence : the stories of real users of the site are very necessary. What is wrong or bad on the site, what is missing? Maybe some extra functions?
Quality of technical implementation : how reliable the site is, safe, stable, stable, fast, meets modern requirements, etc.
Design : Does the design prevent you from using the site? Are the accents logical? Is the site beautiful for your taste?
Usability and accessibility : Are all pages really needed? Is user interaction consistent and logical? Is the site accessible to people with disabilities?
Offer refinements and additions for the task list.
Once again I remind you that for convenience it is better not to confuse in the comments ratings on several aspects at once. For example, write separately about design flaws, and separately about errors in HTML code. If possible, be constructive: it is desirable not only to point out the problem, but also to offer your own version of its solution. ')
After a week, next Tuesday (there is an assumption that this day is better for undertakings than Friday), the results of the website expert review at www.gosuslugi.ru will be summed up and a report will be published, including a list of advantages and disadvantages of the site, the wishes of users and just interesting facts. About the site.