For a long time the idea has been sitting in my head - but there is neither time nor energy to realize everything on my own.
Once every few years, a problem arises before a person who cares -
elections are
coming .
For whatever evil vote is not necessary,
of all the evils, it is better to choose the lesser one . You will not choose - they will choose for you.
To make your choice objectively, you need to follow political life constantly and in several sources.
Clearing the news of the "water" mixed with the "noodles" and make an objective picture is not an easy job that requires a lot of effort, time and analytical skills.
Understand that Putin is bad - easy, but who else, for whom to put a tick?
')
So, I want for a short time to collect as much information as possible about the presidential / deputies / mayors.
I think that a person as a politician can be judged as a politician by three things:- what did (specific actions, initiatives)
- what he achieved (the results of work in the post)
- what he said (to journalists at press conferences, other political leaders)
This is much more important physique, type of person, origin, election promises and other garbage, because of what people vote.
The essence of the project
The idea is simple - to make such a site, by going to which, a person sees a short list of the most popular and unpopular (that is, against which people) policy decisions. These may be decisions long forgotten, but the most crucial, the most important.
For example, Dmitry Medvedev:
- Increased the term of office of the president to six years
- Initiated the creation and adoption of the law "On Police"
- Talked a lot about the imperfection of our democracy
For each decision, you can vote "for" or "against", which helps weed out the most important from the husk.
All solutions can be filtered by position, popularity, novelty.
We also need expert comments to help a person understand what is bad and what is good about this or that solution.
It can be well-known figures, analysts, and maybe ordinary people who ate the “elephant” on politics.
Naturally, every day the news should be updated so that over time a more and more complete picture emerged.
I think that such a view, formed by the community, may turn out to be much more objective than, for example, an article made by one person, and perhaps by request.
It is much faster to see information about politics on such a website than to dig into the news archive in all its diversity.
And now, finally, the picture is more fun for the sake than illustrations:

I want to hear comments habrasoobschestva. Will it work, will it be useful for society?
Perhaps there are people who are ready to help the project: designers, web designers, programmers, or just caring people who are ready for the slave labor of a copywriter and a moderator.
And maybe the idea is useless, well, let's throw it :)