Services for choosing hosting in RuNet
Hello, Habrahabr!
We have compiled a selection of various ratings and services of the Internet, designed to help site owners choose the best provider and facilitate this process.
Ping-admin.ru
Rating of hosting, based on objective indicators. The main criterion used in the evaluation is uptime. Other indicators used to determine the positions in the ranking are the load time of the home page of the hosting site, the average download speed, and other time parameters. Given that the rating results are based on measurable indicators, the results can be called objective. However, the uninterrupted functioning of the hosting site does not always mean high-quality work of client projects. On the other hand, the resource provides an opportunity to get at least some unbiased information.
Hostobzor.ru
One of the oldest hosting directories with reviews in runet. Each hosting provider can create its own page with information about the services offered and tariffs. The site has published more than 4,000 reviews of hosters registered in the catalog and allowed to leave feedback about themselves. Interestingly, only current clients of companies have the ability to add feedback. Thus, the creators of the site solve the problem of possible black PR from competitors. On the other hand, existing customers may be afraid to leave negative feedback due to a possible hoster response.
Hosting101.ru
A large and popular directory reviews about hosts. Implemented a convenient response system. In addition to the standard text comment, users can note the advantages and disadvantages of the provider indicated by other users or add their own. The disadvantages include the inability to determine the veracity of the response. To leave a comment is not required even registration. Testimonials can be left as real customers, as well as competitors of the company, or just lovers of the “troll” community.
')
HostDB.ru
A portal about hosting with a rating of providers. Comprehensive rating is based on customer feedback and hoster activity on the site. Hosting companies within the portal can publish news, inform customers about current promotions and organize surveys for users. For each active action hoster receives additional points to the rating. A more objective rating option is the estimated one. It is based on an average user rating. The very idea of an estimated rating is good, but so far ill-considered. It is not very correct to rank by the average company rating with one or a hundred reviews. Perhaps, for more adequate results, you should enter a minimum threshold for the number of estimates for participation in the rating or come up with another solution.
Sincerely, TELHosting
We have compiled a selection of various ratings and services of the Internet, designed to help site owners choose the best provider and facilitate this process.
Ping-admin.ru
Rating of hosting, based on objective indicators. The main criterion used in the evaluation is uptime. Other indicators used to determine the positions in the ranking are the load time of the home page of the hosting site, the average download speed, and other time parameters. Given that the rating results are based on measurable indicators, the results can be called objective. However, the uninterrupted functioning of the hosting site does not always mean high-quality work of client projects. On the other hand, the resource provides an opportunity to get at least some unbiased information.
Hostobzor.ru
One of the oldest hosting directories with reviews in runet. Each hosting provider can create its own page with information about the services offered and tariffs. The site has published more than 4,000 reviews of hosters registered in the catalog and allowed to leave feedback about themselves. Interestingly, only current clients of companies have the ability to add feedback. Thus, the creators of the site solve the problem of possible black PR from competitors. On the other hand, existing customers may be afraid to leave negative feedback due to a possible hoster response.
Hosting101.ru
A large and popular directory reviews about hosts. Implemented a convenient response system. In addition to the standard text comment, users can note the advantages and disadvantages of the provider indicated by other users or add their own. The disadvantages include the inability to determine the veracity of the response. To leave a comment is not required even registration. Testimonials can be left as real customers, as well as competitors of the company, or just lovers of the “troll” community.
')
HostDB.ru
A portal about hosting with a rating of providers. Comprehensive rating is based on customer feedback and hoster activity on the site. Hosting companies within the portal can publish news, inform customers about current promotions and organize surveys for users. For each active action hoster receives additional points to the rating. A more objective rating option is the estimated one. It is based on an average user rating. The very idea of an estimated rating is good, but so far ill-considered. It is not very correct to rank by the average company rating with one or a hundred reviews. Perhaps, for more adequate results, you should enter a minimum threshold for the number of estimates for participation in the rating or come up with another solution.
Sincerely, TELHosting
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/114020/
All Articles