📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

The stage of preparation of the project in theory

This article discusses the theoretical foundations of the most important stage in project management - namely, its preparation. This should be interesting both for beginners in such a difficult task as project management, as well as novice startups, and possibly experienced managers.

What is a project?

The project is a one-time, non-recurring activity or a set of actions, as a result of which clearly set goals are achieved over a certain period of time.
')
In a sense, all projects are the same. Everyone has consumer (s) and / or patron (s) who are waiting for results from the project to be achieved at a specific time. Projects are often implemented with the goal of creating something new or making big changes that can be considered as a completed activity. The project may arise based on the new requests of consumers or users of services, or from the possibility to get benefits for the organization, or based on the new needs of the organization.

A project is a practical activity that is carried out in a specific context and is subject to its influence. General characteristics of the projects:


Each project has 3 key dimensions - budget, time and quality , which must be balanced for successful project management. Therefore, the main task in project management is precisely the balance of these measurements - to meet the allocated budget, while not going beyond the time constraints and to ensure an acceptable quality. From here also 3 basic signs of failure of projects follow:


There is no one “right” way to manage a project. Traditional project management approaches are focused on technical aspects, and less attention is often paid to the influence of people on project implementation. However, it is people who order and support projects, so the leadership, motivation and management of people involved in a project is as important as the use of appropriate planning, control and monitoring methods.

Common deficiencies in project implementation :



Based on their research, Elbeyk and Thomas identified 10 factors that many identify as critical to the success of the project (arranged according to priorities):

  1. clear goals;
  2. accurate planning and control;
  3. high qualification of the project manager;
  4. good administrative support;
  5. sufficient amount of time and resources;
  6. fulfillment of their obligations by all participants;
  7. widespread consumer engagement;
  8. good communication;
  9. good organization and structure of the project;
  10. opportunity to terminate the project.


Defining project boundaries


The project begins with an idea and arises in order to meet human needs. The idea is to do something that seems necessary. Transforming ideas into a project begins with an understanding of the nature of need as a driving force. Therefore, needs are the main driving force behind the project.

3 phases in determining needs :
  1. Emergence of needs - all interested parties should warn and anticipate needs, responding to them proactively;
  2. Needs recognition - needs awareness based on information gathering and discussion with AP. The main task at this stage is to transform the emerging need for goals, which will begin to determine the results of the project;
  3. Needs formulation - clarifying the understanding of needs through a more accurate description of its characteristic features. The wording of what should be done, i.e. definition of boundaries, the wording of the project.


Problems of not accurately determining needs:



In order to understand the scope of the project it is necessary to have the following information:

  1. Who are the stakeholders (AP) and what are their needs for the project?
  2. What are the goals and objectives of the project and how are they going to be implemented within the appropriate resource and time constraints? (purpose and purpose)
  3. What are the project opportunities and threats for its successful implementation?


AP and their needs

The most important ES for the project:
  1. Project promoter - a person or a group of people who initiate and support a project, provide resources and charge you with its implementation;
  2. The project team is a group of people willing to carry out the tasks and carry out the necessary activities; 3. Functional managers and other people who manage the resources you need and have useful experience and knowledge for you;
  3. Influential people or groups likely to be affected by the project or its results


Depending on the specifics of the project, many other groups or individuals may be interested in it:



After the main ES are established, this information should be used in order to provide the project with the greatest possible support. It is imperative to check how people react to the project before other options for its implementation are excluded from the planning process. If this opportunity is fully exploited, the project team will find out about many potential obstacles and will be well informed about the priorities of each group. One of the ways to understand the reactions of different stakeholders is to analyze their points of view on each of the key dimensions of the project - budget, time and quality.

Definition of the purpose and objectives of the project

The purpose of the project is a broad concept and can be correlated with the mission and values ​​of the organization, while the goals of the project define more precisely what they strive to achieve by implementing the project and how its success can be determined.

Goals must meet SMART criteria:



The goals set provide an opportunity to determine the steps by which the project’s purpose can be realized and not allow one to stray from the right path; used to ensure that the project fits well with the organization’s activities.
Clarity of purpose is important for understanding what needs to be done. If clear goals are set, it means that there is a definite system of views on the final result. Based on the goals set, the project is structured so that it can be effectively monitored and managed. However, sometimes there is a need to revise the objectives, because in the process of project implementation there may be new circumstances unknown at the planning stage. Therefore, the goals should not be "stone".

Opportunities and threats

The study of opportunities and threats at the initial stage of a project may be important to determine its scale. Regular discussions with stakeholders can reveal many potential opportunities and threats associated with the project. Risk management (possible threats to the project) will be discussed below.

Check the feasibility of the project



The purpose of the feasibility test is to determine whether the required outputs or results will be achieved using the available resources. The verification process considers the following aspects:
will be supported both in terms of the processes used and in the sense of the intended results.
The following questions will help determine the value of the project for the organization:


Costs and benefits for project evaluation


To draft a budget, financial costs are divided into two main categories:

Benefits in project management are divided in the same way as in financial accounting for:

Your ratings should include:

Project evaluation provides an opportunity to clarify whether the cost of project results will exceed the cost of resources used for the project. Nevertheless, it is very important to evaluate the project not only from an economic point of view. - the project should be considered in the context of the organization’s mission, its political and social responsibilities and concerns, its strategic direction and how the market or public opinion will respond to the organization’s decision to launch the project.
Despite the fact that projects have certain unique characteristics, most of them have a similar financial structure - the cost of development must be paid before receipt of revenue, i.e. need a temporary source of money. In short-term projects, the issue of costs and benefits is solved quite simply. In cases of more complex, especially in the presence of intangible benefits, it is necessary to make judgments based on the comparison of values. Many projects have either a large interval between payments and receipts, or the need for a large advance payment, or both. From financial tz. money, more precisely the capital that needs to be invested in a project to pay for the cost of development, can be established, since it is usually attracted from external or internal sources. Its cost is included in project feasibility assessments, as well as in project budgets and reports. To assess the financial value of the project there is no need to distinguish between profit and cash flows, you can concentrate only on the analysis of cash flows.
There are several methods for estimating the cash flows for a project (they will not be discussed in detail here):


Risks and situational planning


Risk - the possibility of an adverse impact on the project, OR an event or situation that could jeopardize the entire project or part of it. Risks can be internal, i.e. arising within the project, and external, emerging from the context or environment of the project.
There are 4 stages of risk management:
  1. Identifying risk - determining which risks may affect a project, and describing the characteristics of each one.
  2. Impact assessment is a risk assessment in terms of the range of possible outcomes related to projects and the potential impact of each.
  3. Planning backup options to reduce the impact of the most likely risks.
  4. Ensuring that risks are always in sight.


The main categories of risk are:


There are several ways to identify risk. This is primarily a discussion of the project with the AP and consideration of various perspectives, during which individual APs can see threats to their interests. It is very important to assess the risk at each stage of project implementation and plan possible ways to reduce its effects. Where the risk can be foreseen, it is necessary to develop a situational plan that can be applied if the risk situation is implemented.

Risk assessment and impact analysis: key questions


Risk assessment - measuring the likelihood of risk becoming a reality; Impact analysis - measuring the sensitivity of a project to each specific risk. Key questions are as follows:

Risk management strategies:
  1. Avoidance of risk - for example, withdrawal from a contract;
  2. Reducing risk — for example, regular inspections can reduce the likelihood of producing a low-quality product;
  3. Protection against risk - for example, insurance against possible accidents;
  4. Risk management - for example, the use of written agreements in areas of disagreement;
  5. Relocation of risk - for example, the transfer of responsibility for the execution of a risky assignment under a project to another organization that has more experience

At the initial stage of the project, it is necessary to create a risk register in which you need to specify a description of the risk, the degree of its influence (strong, weak), the likelihood of occurrence (high, medium, low) and the action to be taken when the risk occurs.
The situational plan is just necessary in order to foresee the response to potential crisis situations. Its goal is to ensure that the budget balance, timeliness and quality of work on the project.

Basis for project action



After the purpose and objectives of the project have been reviewed and discussed, and after checking its feasibility, it is necessary to develop a document that is the basis for the project's actions. This document should indicate the starting point of all future work on the project, and it will be the basis for conclusions about whether the project was successful in the end or not. Sometimes this document is called the project agreement, but often it contains specific information in the form of a project summary. It is usually created by the project manager, but it is very important that it is discussed with the project patrons and all the major stakeholders. It should fix the agreed point of view on the key characteristics of the project:

A typical project summary provides a detailed description of both the project objectives and practical recommendations for achieving its results. It should summarize the agreements on which the project is based, and thus, it offers a rationale for spending time and effort.
List of summary titles:


Conclusion


In this article, as briefly and concretely as possible, the theoretical foundations of the project preparation stage were considered. For this, the literature of the MIM LINK School of Business was used, the alumnus of which is the author. The six-stage model of project management is studied in detail in this school’s training course, and if there is interest on the part of the community, it will be possible to continue a series of articles on this topic.

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/111482/


All Articles