
The peculiarity of Wikileaks as an information portal of a new type and features of perception aberrations of reality that can be initiated by it, consciously or not,
have already become the subject of discussion at Habré .
An interesting means of identifying the true intentions of the creators of Wikileaks can be the study of the geography of the distribution of mirror servers of the resource on the globe, as well as localization in space and in time of the information presented in it. The last task has already begun to solve, but now it came to the servers.
Information about all 1334 servers Wikileaks
localized Lawrence Muller using the geo
database GeoLite City . Data is collected in a KML file
available for download . You can open it in Google Earth, or, for example, in another open geointerface - ERDAS TITAN. Reduced versions can be viewed, for example, in Google Maps.
Showing not only the locations of the servers themselves (usually with high accuracy, but here in Siberia they all ended up in one clearly conditional point), but also the rays (large circle arcs) leading from them to the central server located in Sweden.
')

As a rule, Wikileaks mirrors are everywhere, and the better the country's IT infrastructure is developed, the more there are. Especially a lot of mirrors in the United States, which is strange - it seems that it was the United States that suffered the brunt of compromising information, and it would probably not be very difficult to block them quickly. At the same time, there is not a single mirror, for example, in Israel, as, by the way, in the Middle East in general (except perhaps Turkey) and in Central Asia.

No mirror seems to be in continental Africa. In Russia, I counted them 18.
Why do you
need to study the spatial distribution of information in Wikileaks resources?
1. For whatever purposes - good or pragmatic - Wikileaks would not be created, it is obvious that it can be used to massively distort the image of the situation in the world.
2. This task, that is, the problem of misinformation, due to the specific features of the circulation of information on the Internet and social networks, can be solved without distorting the information (ie, without intentional lies and direct disinformation), only by shifting the focus of user attention to this or that document. That is, due to bias, due to the arbitrary choice of material for promotion in the media and on the Internet from the bottomless stocks of Wikileaks.
3. It is very interesting [possible] the presence in Wikileaks taboos on certain topics / issues / positions. It was possible to identify them with the help of space-time data localization, and their subsequent analysis.
