The idea of a social project. Working title "Disassembly"
The bottom line. combine information, discussion, assessment of any conflict / controversial / incomprehensible events.
How. The organizers and participants (possibly limited by rating) set the discussion area for the event, say the basic news article, TEMU. According to the topic, participants are free to add components to the database:
- FACTS / confirmed information (decision on credibility is a special question, probably the status of “trust” is required), as well as a chronicle of events
- LINKS / news, discussions, blog discussions
- JUDGMENTS / in the form of some statements long in a sentence or two, to which participants can add a rating (essentially a hidden vote), moreover judgments can have a MKC correlating with the base: "+" (for), "-" (against), " x "(negative, both sides are wrong)," = "(not worth attention)
- DISCUSSION / CLASSIC FORUM
- ARGUMENTS / small justifications, also with a “logic rating”
Now the most interesting - the connection of these components: on the summary page we see above the TOPIC, below it the FACTS (blog-list of articles) and LINKS. Below, separated by a SIGN, say, into two corresponding ARGUMENTS, JUDGMENTS. And quite below DISCUSSION.
')
In this case 4 POSITIONS are described, but probably according to the rating it is worth to highlight 2-3. In short, it is worth thinking about visualization. Probably need to do some schemes. For example: on the left +, on the right -, below x, a = either lower or not as a field but by other visual means. Well, this is actually a particular - in practice, it will be seen.
Total The user “from ship to ball”: immediately sees the THEME, reads FACTS and chronicles, votes for JUDGMENTS and (if he does not see the worthy - makes his own), evaluates the persuasiveness of ARGUMENTS (if he wants, discusses this ARGUMENT in the ARGUMENT DISCUSSION), reads and speaks out DISCUSSIONS OF JUDGMENTS and TOPICS.
What for.
I do not like the stupidity of the classic "big discussions": Article ... and 300 pages of comments. Well, I can not read it! And is it necessary?
I want to know the main thing! What, where, when, why, why, with what account (including how much was given) and what came of it. Well, maybe I want to say my “Yes” or “no” by pressing the sacramental [+ Web2.0-] button. And probably
I'm not so alone ...
While in such cases I use Google. And I would like to go on such a disassembly.
Implementation. It remains to say about the “factory” of such a service. He, as they say, should be ready ... First of all, to overloads. It will certainly be hot. The hosting, reliability and security of the project database will be tested for durability. Likely scandals, pressure, lawsuits. Apparently, the newcomer will not master. But the popularity ... Phew, just think, it captures the spirit!
Enough to ensure the realization of the idea, user-friendly interface and the confidence of the audience. Content itself will come.
How is the idea? What do you think about the possibilities of implementation? Or maybe already where there is?
PS Planned to put in some collective blog, but so far karma has not come out. I will publish the text as is, without formatting and so on. Stuff because as a beginner. I hope it can be corrected later.
I have other similar thoughts, if someone will be useful ... Yes, and if they are useless, then please minus, so that you can think in the right direction. :)
How. The organizers and participants (possibly limited by rating) set the discussion area for the event, say the basic news article, TEMU. According to the topic, participants are free to add components to the database:
- FACTS / confirmed information (decision on credibility is a special question, probably the status of “trust” is required), as well as a chronicle of events
- LINKS / news, discussions, blog discussions
- JUDGMENTS / in the form of some statements long in a sentence or two, to which participants can add a rating (essentially a hidden vote), moreover judgments can have a MKC correlating with the base: "+" (for), "-" (against), " x "(negative, both sides are wrong)," = "(not worth attention)
- DISCUSSION / CLASSIC FORUM
- ARGUMENTS / small justifications, also with a “logic rating”
Now the most interesting - the connection of these components: on the summary page we see above the TOPIC, below it the FACTS (blog-list of articles) and LINKS. Below, separated by a SIGN, say, into two corresponding ARGUMENTS, JUDGMENTS. And quite below DISCUSSION.
')
In this case 4 POSITIONS are described, but probably according to the rating it is worth to highlight 2-3. In short, it is worth thinking about visualization. Probably need to do some schemes. For example: on the left +, on the right -, below x, a = either lower or not as a field but by other visual means. Well, this is actually a particular - in practice, it will be seen.
Total The user “from ship to ball”: immediately sees the THEME, reads FACTS and chronicles, votes for JUDGMENTS and (if he does not see the worthy - makes his own), evaluates the persuasiveness of ARGUMENTS (if he wants, discusses this ARGUMENT in the ARGUMENT DISCUSSION), reads and speaks out DISCUSSIONS OF JUDGMENTS and TOPICS.
What for.
I do not like the stupidity of the classic "big discussions": Article ... and 300 pages of comments. Well, I can not read it! And is it necessary?
I want to know the main thing! What, where, when, why, why, with what account (including how much was given) and what came of it. Well, maybe I want to say my “Yes” or “no” by pressing the sacramental [+ Web2.0-] button. And probably
I'm not so alone ...
While in such cases I use Google. And I would like to go on such a disassembly.
Implementation. It remains to say about the “factory” of such a service. He, as they say, should be ready ... First of all, to overloads. It will certainly be hot. The hosting, reliability and security of the project database will be tested for durability. Likely scandals, pressure, lawsuits. Apparently, the newcomer will not master. But the popularity ... Phew, just think, it captures the spirit!
Enough to ensure the realization of the idea, user-friendly interface and the confidence of the audience. Content itself will come.
How is the idea? What do you think about the possibilities of implementation? Or maybe already where there is?
PS Planned to put in some collective blog, but so far karma has not come out. I will publish the text as is, without formatting and so on. Stuff because as a beginner. I hope it can be corrected later.
I have other similar thoughts, if someone will be useful ... Yes, and if they are useless, then please minus, so that you can think in the right direction. :)
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/10897/
All Articles